1995
DOI: 10.1016/0958-6946(95)00046-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular architecture of the lactococcal cell surface as it relates to important industrial properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…diacetilactis. Moreover, it is also in agreement with the fact that the phage receptors present at the surfaces of other strains of L. lactis were found to be located mainly on carbohydrate moieties (22,35,45,50).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…diacetilactis. Moreover, it is also in agreement with the fact that the phage receptors present at the surfaces of other strains of L. lactis were found to be located mainly on carbohydrate moieties (22,35,45,50).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The adhesion behavior of microbial cells has been shown to depend on the balance of electrostatic and van der Waals interactions and on the hydrophobic character of the surfaces involved (38,42,53,54), pointing to the possible influence of the respective zeta potentials and surface hydrophobicities. Moreover, the production of extracellular substances either at the cell surface or in the surrounding medium has been shown to influence adhesion (14, 55).The surface hydrophobicity and composition of lactic acid bacteria have been studied primarily by microbial adhesion to hydrocarbon (7,18,40,46,56) and by biochemical analysis (7,18,22,35,45,49,50,56), respectively. However, the relevance of these methods is questionable for interfacial phenomena.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8). The difference in the burst size estimates relative to liquid culture can be explained by environmental dependence (28), and molecular explanations for differing susceptibilities and adsorption have been proposed (6,12). However, these factors also can be explained by spatial effects: spatial colony heterogeneity, localized modification of the environment by hyphae (19), and the spatial distribution-correlation of phage and hosts throughout the microcosm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The susceptibility of streptomycetes to phage infection varies with the age of the mycelia, with older mycelia being more resistant than young tips (11,22,30). This variation may be due to higher rates of DNA synthesis in hyphal-tip proximal regions (14) or to differences in the density of, or area covered by, surface receptor molecules (6,12). The replication rate of phage therefore depends on the rate of adsorption to, and infection of, susceptible hosts, transportation processes such as rates of diffusion of phage, and the burst size of the virus.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%