2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)00556-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Basis for Regulatory Subunit Diversity in cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase

Abstract: Both the diversity and similarity of cAMP binding sites are demonstrated by this new type II regulatory subunit structure. The structure represents an intramolecular paradigm for the cooperative triad that links two cAMP binding sites through a domain interface to the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. The domain interface surface is created by the binding of only one cAMP molecule and is enabled by amino acid sequence variability within the peptide chain that tethers the two domains together.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
161
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The β roll is surrounded by the N-terminal α-helix A, a short internal α-helix located between β-strands 6 and 7, designated as the phosphate-binding-cassette (PBC), and two α-helices B and C (αB and αC) located at the C-terminus. This structure, together with previously determined structures of PKA, CAP and Epac, confirmed the β roll topology to be conserved in all CNBDs (Weber and Steitz, 1987;Su et al, 1995;Diller et al, 2001;Rehmann et al, 2003).…”
Section: Structure Of the Hcn2 Cnbd In The Ligand-bound Statesupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The β roll is surrounded by the N-terminal α-helix A, a short internal α-helix located between β-strands 6 and 7, designated as the phosphate-binding-cassette (PBC), and two α-helices B and C (αB and αC) located at the C-terminus. This structure, together with previously determined structures of PKA, CAP and Epac, confirmed the β roll topology to be conserved in all CNBDs (Weber and Steitz, 1987;Su et al, 1995;Diller et al, 2001;Rehmann et al, 2003).…”
Section: Structure Of the Hcn2 Cnbd In The Ligand-bound Statesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The structure of the MloK1 CNBD shows the characteristic properties similar to the HCN2 CNBD structure (Figures 1 and 2), consisting of a β roll core topped by a bundle of four α-helices and a short PBC helix (Zagotta et al, 2003). Thus, the overall structure is highly conserved in all CNBDs (Weber and Steitz, 1987;Su et al, 1995;Diller et al, 2001;Rehmann et al, 2003).…”
Section: Structural Basis Of the Mlok1 Cnbd In The Ligand-free And -Bmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Priority was set to placing gaps within loops connecting secondary structure elements. The cAMP-binding regions were manually curated with the program GeneDoc (Nicholas et al 1997), taking into consideration the crystal structures of bovine RI␣ (Su et al 1995) and rat RII␤ (Diller et al 2001). The Gonnet weight matrix (Gonnet et al 1994) was used in the sequence alignments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). The alignment of the cAMP-binding domains was curated based on structural evidence from the crystal structures of bovine RI␣ (Su et al 1995) and rat RII␤ (Diller et al 2001). Most of the variability in the cAMP-binding domains corresponded to the loop between ␤-strand 4 and ␤-strand 5 of both domain A and domain B, and the C-terminal region.…”
Section: Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation