“…within the beginning of the pandemic to August 2020. Table S1 (supplementary material) presents a classification of the published reviews based on their main purposes: (i) reviews and minireviews about the main advances carried out in the diagnostic tests in the last months, together with a critical discussion about their utility [2] , [3] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] ; (ii) information about the biosensors and the nanotechnology is presented as a useful tool to develop new strategies for the detection of the infection and also for its treatment [8] , [11] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] , [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] , [65] , [66] , [67] ; (iii) different point of view about how the artificial intelligence (AI) can be presented as a versatile tool to control the pandemic and, even more interesting, in containing the spread of the virus [20] , [68] , [69] ; (iv) current and update information about the structure and genomic of SARS-CoV-2 [70] , [71] , [72] , [73] ...…”