2010
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular basis of FIR-mediated c-myc transcriptional control

Abstract: The Far UpStream Element (FUSE) regulatory system promotes a peak in the concentration of c-Myc during cell cycle. First, the FBP transcriptional activator binds to the FUSE DNA element upstream of the c-myc promoter. Then, FBP recruits its specific repressor (FIR) which acts as an on/off transcriptional switch. Here we describe the molecular basis of FIR recruitment showing that the tandem RNA recognitions motifs of FIR provide a platform for independent FUSE DNA and FBP protein binding and explaining the str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
68
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4e6 As transcription intensifies, the melted DNA bubble at FUSE expands upstream, allowing the recruitment of FIR via DNA-protein interactions and protein-protein interaction between a shallow groove in FIR RNA recognition motif 2 and the most NH 2 terminal a-helix of FBP ( Figure 10, A and B). 22,23,54,55 FIR then restores TFIIH helicase activity to basal levels, depressing transcription. 7 Falling levels of supercoiling combined with Figure 10 Scheme for FBP operating as a molecular cruise control to help set MYC levels and to constrain fluctuations around the set point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4e6 As transcription intensifies, the melted DNA bubble at FUSE expands upstream, allowing the recruitment of FIR via DNA-protein interactions and protein-protein interaction between a shallow groove in FIR RNA recognition motif 2 and the most NH 2 terminal a-helix of FBP ( Figure 10, A and B). 22,23,54,55 FIR then restores TFIIH helicase activity to basal levels, depressing transcription. 7 Falling levels of supercoiling combined with Figure 10 Scheme for FBP operating as a molecular cruise control to help set MYC levels and to constrain fluctuations around the set point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,24 FBP, FBP2, and FBP3 have three, four, and two tyrosine-rich motifs, respectively. 14,24 The amino termini of FBP and FBP2 include an a-helix that interacts with RNA recognition motif 2 domain of FIR, 2,4,7,16,23 whereas an A/V substitution in FBP3 precludes this interaction. 16 A variety of in vitro and tissue culture experiments have associated FBP binding with a complex set of DNA and RNA targets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 On the other hand, in FBP-Interacting Repressor (FIR) protein, the a-helix face of RRM1 packs onto the b-sheet face of RRM2, creating a stable interface. 61,62 Examples of Trp-mediated homodimerization in other RRM domains have been previously reported, as in the Nup35 protein. 63 In contrast, the RRM modules of the splicing factor Pub60 form a dimeric interface driven by electrostatic interactions involving a flexible loop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAP155 somatic mutations observed in cancers accumulated at a specific site, supporting a gain-of-function of SAP155, and perhaps strengthening binding with FIR or FIRDexon2. The FBP-FIR-FUSE system mediates c-myc transcriptional control because the RNA recognition motifs of FIR provide a platform for independent FUSE DNA and FBP protein binding, and this explains the structural basis of the reversibility of the FBP-FIR interaction (32,33). Does FIRDexon2 interfere with the dimerization of FIR on nucleic acid binding?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%