2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular basis of trait correlations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
104
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, such traits in the dissection approach typically are not measurable via traditional phenotyping approaches. As a further step toward biological insights from such image-derived parameters, we calculated genetic correlations between traits, such as might be considered for selection of desired phenotypic trait combinations in breeding programs (Chen and Lübberstedt, 2010;Stackpole et al, 2011;Porth et al, 2013). The identification of a concerted negative genetic correlation of an indicator of water content/drought tolerance (NIR signal; Figure 2D) with plant height ( Figure 6B) appears to be highly advantageous for breeding strategies: Breeding for higher drought tolerance could simultaneously select lower plant height and vice versa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, such traits in the dissection approach typically are not measurable via traditional phenotyping approaches. As a further step toward biological insights from such image-derived parameters, we calculated genetic correlations between traits, such as might be considered for selection of desired phenotypic trait combinations in breeding programs (Chen and Lübberstedt, 2010;Stackpole et al, 2011;Porth et al, 2013). The identification of a concerted negative genetic correlation of an indicator of water content/drought tolerance (NIR signal; Figure 2D) with plant height ( Figure 6B) appears to be highly advantageous for breeding strategies: Breeding for higher drought tolerance could simultaneously select lower plant height and vice versa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…decisions concerning the design and selection of breeding schemes (Holland et al, 2003;Chen and Lübberstedt, 2010). It has been speculated that the dynamic change of heritability over time for a population is a consequence of changes in the magnitude of G and E effects (Visscher et al, 2008).…”
Section: Change Of Heritability and Trait-trait Genetic And Phenotypimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, root allocation tradeoffs may limit certain RSA combinations, such as between root growth in the topsoil versus deep soil horizons (3,10,47,48), and these tradeoffs may have a genetic basis. Thus, to understand the full architectural possibilities for crop improvement, it is imperative to identify the precise nucleotide polymorphisms that underlie quantitative differences in central RSA traits (49). We used 3D imaging and digital phenotyping to detect regions of the rice genome that control the growth of RSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These traits, which showed moderate to high correlations, could be a guide to breeding programs and these germplasm sets could be used to improve certain traits and design efficient breeding programs. Trait correlations are very useful, as breeders could use them to ameliorate simultaneously correlated traits by reducing undesired side effects when the focus is only on one of the correlated traits (Chen and Lübberstedt, 2010).…”
Section: Correlation Of Qualitative Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%