2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-5790-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular beacon probes for the detection of cisplatin-induced DNA damage

Abstract: Cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)) causes crosslinking of DNA at AG and GG sites in cellular DNA, inhibiting replication, and making it a useful anti-cancer drug. Several techniques have been used previously to detect nucleic acid damage but most of these tools are labour-intensive, time-consuming, and/or expensive. Here, we describe a sensitive, robust, and quantitative tool for detecting cisplatin-induced DNA damage by using fluorescent molecular beacon probes (MB). Our results show a decrease of f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ultralow LOD of our methods is about 5 orders of magnitude lower than that reported for the current DNA‐damage detection methods. [ 4a–e,5,13 ] In addition, a rapid response speed is also essential for high‐throughput damage analysis. Current DNA‐damage sensors mostly require extra process for highly efficient DNA–drug binding and signal amplification, which would bring increased time cost.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ultralow LOD of our methods is about 5 orders of magnitude lower than that reported for the current DNA‐damage detection methods. [ 4a–e,5,13 ] In addition, a rapid response speed is also essential for high‐throughput damage analysis. Current DNA‐damage sensors mostly require extra process for highly efficient DNA–drug binding and signal amplification, which would bring increased time cost.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By DROT‐based direct monitoring of the DNA damage process, the signal change can reach a saturation state with ≈20.5 ± 8.7 s after adding drug, which is even shorter than that of similar strategy using time‐lapse AFM imaging. [ 13f ] With steady‐state monitoring time included, a total analysis time of only ≈15 min is adequate for DNA‐damage analysis by nine different conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point, every group started by determining what effect cisplatin would have on their beacons by following the exact fluorescence testing protocol from the Shire and Loppnow paper. 1 In nearly all cases, groups observed a significant decrease in signal for the trials where the target sequences had been incubated with cisplatin (Figure 8). With their "baseline" established, groups then compared the signal of the trials where they incubated the target sequences with their analogues.…”
Section: Journal Of Chemical Educationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Students would then take this new course after completing their General Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, and Inorganic Chemistry sequences and concurrently with their Biochemistry sequence. Finally, the department also used this as an opportunity to incorporate emerging and cutting-edge techniques 1 in this new course, instead of basing it on more traditional "canned" lab exercises.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time‐resolved fluorescence has also been used to detect DNA damage (20). Recently, molecular beacons (MBs) have been used as sensitive and accurate probes of UV‐induced, chemical and oxidative DNA damage (21–24; A. Mah, F. Teimoory and G.R. Loppnow, unpublished data; Z. Shire and G.R.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%