2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular biomarkers for advanced renal cell carcinoma: Implications for prognosis and therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After carefully review of each of the 50 studies, certain studies were excluded for the following rationale: six studies evaluated CAIX status by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]; five studies evaluated CAIX status by real-time-PCR [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]; one study was on the topic of a single nucleotide polymorphism in the CAIX gene [34]; fourteen studies did not report survival outcome on CAIX expression or survival outcome could not be extracted [17], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47]; and nine studies contained overlapping data with other studies by the same authors or institutions [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56]. Thus, fifteen papers were included in our meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between CAIX expression and prognosis in patients with renal cell carcinoma [16], [18], [19], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68]. The selection process is shown in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After carefully review of each of the 50 studies, certain studies were excluded for the following rationale: six studies evaluated CAIX status by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]; five studies evaluated CAIX status by real-time-PCR [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]; one study was on the topic of a single nucleotide polymorphism in the CAIX gene [34]; fourteen studies did not report survival outcome on CAIX expression or survival outcome could not be extracted [17], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47]; and nine studies contained overlapping data with other studies by the same authors or institutions [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56]. Thus, fifteen papers were included in our meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between CAIX expression and prognosis in patients with renal cell carcinoma [16], [18], [19], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68]. The selection process is shown in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…remaining 42 articles were reviewed, and of these 23 were excluded, the reasons for which are shown in Figure 1. Thus, 19 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis [10,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. Five of these studies [20,22,25,33,36] did not provide data (HR or Kaplan-Meier curve) to calculate the HR for OS, PFS, or DSS, and therefore could not be included in the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariate analysis indicated that CD147+/VEGF+ and CD147−/VEGF− co-expression were independent prognostic indicators for RCC [22]. A study performed in 2010 by Kim et al [20] examined RCC tissue for carbonic anhydrase IX, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and VEGF expression in tissue from 62 patients with RCC, and found that high carbonic anhydrase and COX-2 staining were associated with a better response to cytokine therapy, whereas VEGF expression did not provide prognostic information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…De la controversia respecto a su valor pronóstico se puede inducir que ACIX pueda tener más valor predictivo de respuesta al tratamiento que valor pronóstico en sí misma. Ello está claramente validado en tumores mestastáticos tratados con IL-2 [11][12][13] . En relación con las terapias diana, la expresión de ACIX se ha validado como factor predictivo de respuesta a sorafenib 16 y no se ha relacionado con la respuesta a temsirolimus, donde una expresión alta de phospho-Akt o phospo-S6, moléculas upstream y downstream de la ruta de señalización celular gobernada por mTOR, sí que se …”
Section: Discussionunclassified