2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular biomonitoring of a population of nurses handling antineoplastic drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
26
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
9
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking the overall results of our two monitoring studies into consideration, we have observed that: 1) environmental (surface/clothing) contamination levels were found to be similar to those reported for other Italian hospitals 38) , even with a lower number of positive samples; 2) a very low number of urine samples showed detectable concentrations of the marker compound (i.e., cyclophosphamide), a result in agreement with recent findings indicating surface contamination as not necessarily correlating with positive urine samples 38) , probably because of suboptimal sensitivity of the adopted assays to detect lower concentrations of the drugs in urine; 3) an increased extent of primary DNA damage was observed in exposed subjects handling ANPDs, a positive finding in line with the results from several other studies 14,17,19,39,40) and 4) no significant differences were found for MN frequencies when comparing nurses handling ANPDs and controls (CBMN protocol), in line with previously published studies 11−15) , but an adaptive response in human lymphocytes from subjects with occupational exposure to ANPDs (CBMN/Ara-C protocol) was observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Taking the overall results of our two monitoring studies into consideration, we have observed that: 1) environmental (surface/clothing) contamination levels were found to be similar to those reported for other Italian hospitals 38) , even with a lower number of positive samples; 2) a very low number of urine samples showed detectable concentrations of the marker compound (i.e., cyclophosphamide), a result in agreement with recent findings indicating surface contamination as not necessarily correlating with positive urine samples 38) , probably because of suboptimal sensitivity of the adopted assays to detect lower concentrations of the drugs in urine; 3) an increased extent of primary DNA damage was observed in exposed subjects handling ANPDs, a positive finding in line with the results from several other studies 14,17,19,39,40) and 4) no significant differences were found for MN frequencies when comparing nurses handling ANPDs and controls (CBMN protocol), in line with previously published studies 11−15) , but an adaptive response in human lymphocytes from subjects with occupational exposure to ANPDs (CBMN/Ara-C protocol) was observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, several studies on populations Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. DOI 10.1002/em occupationally exposed to antineoplastics did not show significant differences between smoking and nonsmoking subjects in terms of MN frequency or DNA damage by comet assay [Undeger et al, 1999;Kopjar and GarajVrhovac, 2001;Cornetta et al, 2008], and our findings on workers exposed to antineoplastic drugs are in agreement with such studies. Some studies on populations occupationally exposed to PAHs did not find any effect of smoking on the MN frequency or DNA damage by comet test [Bolognesi et al, 1997;Pitarque et al, 1999], and this was consistent with our results on paving workers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Consistently, some studies reported increased frequencies of micronuclei in peripheral blood lymphocyes [Rekhadevi et al, 2007;Cornetta et al, 2008] and/or exfoliated buccal cells [Cavallo et al, 2007;Rekhadevi et al, 2007] with respect to matched controls. To our knowledge, only 1 study employed an aneuploidy-specific biomarker: FISH analysis with centromeric probes was applied to a small sample of observed micronuclei to characterise their mechanism of origin [Cavallo et al, 2007], and the authors claimed an association between vinorelbine exposure and centromeric-positive micronuclei, but the sample is too small to draw any firm conclusion.…”
Section: Cytostatic Drugs In Healthcare Occupational Settingssupporting
confidence: 56%