2002
DOI: 10.1021/cr0006876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Bonding and Interactions at Aqueous Surfaces as Probed by Vibrational Sum Frequency Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

38
1,448
4
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,060 publications
(1,498 citation statements)
references
References 191 publications
(579 reference statements)
38
1,448
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It is thereby free, and protrudes out of the water phase, confirming earlier predictions from computations. 11 Roughly the same picture of the existence of the free OH bonds at the interface has since been consistently observed in SFG experiments by Richmond, 5 Eisenthal, 12 Allen, 13 and Gan et al, 14 and also in computer simulations. 3,[15][16][17][18][19] The structure of water at the hydrophobic organic/water interfaces was shown to be similar to that at the air/water interface.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It is thereby free, and protrudes out of the water phase, confirming earlier predictions from computations. 11 Roughly the same picture of the existence of the free OH bonds at the interface has since been consistently observed in SFG experiments by Richmond, 5 Eisenthal, 12 Allen, 13 and Gan et al, 14 and also in computer simulations. 3,[15][16][17][18][19] The structure of water at the hydrophobic organic/water interfaces was shown to be similar to that at the air/water interface.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The square root of the SFG intensity at 2878 cm -1 is used since it is proportional to the population of the target species (i.e., DPPC in domain (ii)) based on the theory of SFG. [42][43][44][45][46][47] It is interesting to note that the SFG profile fits well with the fraction domain (ii), i.e., ii. Both measurements of the AFM and SFG exhibit a maximum around 41°C, indicating that the two independent observations well correlate with each other.…”
Section: Comparison Between Sfg and Afm Observations During The Phasementioning
confidence: 92%
“…[31][32][33][34] VSFG spectroscopy is a second-order nonlinear spectroscopic technique that, under the electric dipole approximation, occurs only in the region of the material in which the inversion symmetry is broken, specifically at the interface. The vibrational signatures of an adsorbate in the mid-IR region are sensitive to the local environment, so VSFG spectroscopy can be used in unraveling the adsorbate-adsorbate and adsorbate-substrate interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%