2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.698962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Characteristics of Novel Phage vB_ShiP-A7 Infecting Multidrug-Resistant Shigella flexneri and Escherichia coli, and Its Bactericidal Effect in vitro and in vivo

Abstract: In recent years, increasing evidence has shown that bacteriophages (phages) can inhibit infection caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Here, we isolated a new phage, named vB_ShiP-A7, using MDR Shigella flexneri as the host. vB_ShiP-A7 is a novel member of Podoviridae, with a latency period of approximately 35 min and a burst size of approximately 100 phage particles/cell. The adsorption rate constant of phage vB_ShiP-A7 to its host S. flexneri was 1.405 × 10–8 mL/min. The vB_ShiP-A7 genome is a linea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, a high burst value leads to higher lytic activity [21], a wanted feature in phages that will be used in biocontrol applications. In agreement with our findings, similar results were observed by Xu and coworkers for the Shigella phage vB_ShiP-A7 (100 PFU cell −1 , latent period of 35 min) [22] and by Ahamed et al [23] for Sfin-1 (28 PFU cell −1 , latent period of 5 min). On the contrary, several authors found phages with a high burst value and a short latent period such as phage vBSdyS-ISF003 (128 PFU cell −1 , 10 min) [24] and phage 2019SD1 (151 PFU cell −1 , 20 min) [20], and phages with a low burst value with a long latent period, e.g., phage pSf-2 (16 PFU cell −1 , 30 min) [19] and SGF2 (38 PFU cell −1 , 40 min) [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In general, a high burst value leads to higher lytic activity [21], a wanted feature in phages that will be used in biocontrol applications. In agreement with our findings, similar results were observed by Xu and coworkers for the Shigella phage vB_ShiP-A7 (100 PFU cell −1 , latent period of 35 min) [22] and by Ahamed et al [23] for Sfin-1 (28 PFU cell −1 , latent period of 5 min). On the contrary, several authors found phages with a high burst value and a short latent period such as phage vBSdyS-ISF003 (128 PFU cell −1 , 10 min) [24] and phage 2019SD1 (151 PFU cell −1 , 20 min) [20], and phages with a low burst value with a long latent period, e.g., phage pSf-2 (16 PFU cell −1 , 30 min) [19] and SGF2 (38 PFU cell −1 , 40 min) [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Similar results were obtained by other authors when they evaluated resistance of S. flexneri (Mallick et al, 2021; Shahin & Bouzari, 2018; Zhang et al, 2012) and S. dysenteriae (Kumar et al, 2021) phages at 40 and 50°C. In contrast, another phage lytic against S. flexneri was almost completely inactivated at 50°C (Xu et al, 2021). At 60°C, seven of the ten phages evaluated showed significant reductions, though the other three, namely Shi30, Shi33, and Shi93, showed a higher resistance even at 70°C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many authors have studied phage viability at various physicochemical conditions such as thermal treatments (Jamal et al, 2015; Xu et al, 2021), varying pH (Mallick et al, 2021; Zhang et al, 2012), and salt concentrations (Kumar et al, 2021; Shahin & Bouzari, 2018), the activity of phage/ Shigella systems has never been evaluated in physicochemical conditions similar to those found in food matrices. Moreover, even though many phage–host studies have been previously performed, those focusing on Shigella strains have been scarcely documented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment was repeated thrice, and one-step growth curves were plotted using GraphPad Prism 8 (San Diego, CA, USA) software. The burst size of the phage is equal to the amount of phage at the end of lysis divided by the initial number of bacterial cells at the time of infection ( Xu et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%