2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-001-0625-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characteristics of poly(propylene imine) dendrimers as studied with translational diffusion and viscometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
6
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results demonstrate clearly the importance of the solvent. This is particularly visible for DAB‐CN, which exhibits larger hydrodynamic radii in chloroform than in acetone 45, 50. CDCl 3 is probably the best solvent for the core, whereas MeOH is the best one for the TEO segments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results demonstrate clearly the importance of the solvent. This is particularly visible for DAB‐CN, which exhibits larger hydrodynamic radii in chloroform than in acetone 45, 50. CDCl 3 is probably the best solvent for the core, whereas MeOH is the best one for the TEO segments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The expectation that V D increases as n R where R > 1 is also supported by experimental techniques such as SAXS, 41,42 SANS, 23 dilute solution viscometry, 23,78 and translational diffusion 22 as well as computer simulations [22][23][24]42,43,45,47,51,79 where the radius (r) of different dendrimer constructs was measured. Therefore, the change in volume of a dendrimer molecule with increasing generation number is expected to scale as n R where R takes a value greater than unity, [22][23][24][25][41][42][43]45,47,51,78,79 contrary to what was found in Figure 6. According to the trend shown in Figure 6, an excited pyrene probes a volume V Py that increases as ∼n 1 , i.e., more slowly than expected if the pyrenes were free to probe the entire dendrimer interior (V D ) that scales as n R with R > 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more generally accepted method -pulsed field-gradient spin-echo nuclear magnetic resonance (PFGSE-NMR), which seems to give a better value for D e , is not based on redox reaction and thus does not suffer this drawback [15]. Secondly, the D e of PPI was calculated in an aqueous buffer environment as opposed to the organic environment such as acetonitrile and chloroform [16] where most diffusion coefficients of higher values have been calculated. Solute-solvent interaction (solvation) in this aqueous environment may result in a 'drag' of the molecule thereby lowering its D e .…”
Section: Voltammetric Studies Of G1 Ppi In Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%