2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2016.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Fasciola gigantica from western Java, Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phylogenetic analysis of nad 1 sequences suggests that haplotypes of F. gigantica found in Asian countries can be categorized into three haplogroups: A, B and C [20, 44, 51, 52]. Haplogroup A is found in Indian subcontinent, including Nepal and Bangladesh [20, 52], while all three haplotypes are found in Southeast Asia, including Thailand and Myanmar [44, 51, 53, 54]. Our analysis suggested that Egyptian haplotypes of F. gigantica formed a monophyletic clade sister to those from Asia to the exclusion of Zambian samples (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic analysis of nad 1 sequences suggests that haplotypes of F. gigantica found in Asian countries can be categorized into three haplogroups: A, B and C [20, 44, 51, 52]. Haplogroup A is found in Indian subcontinent, including Nepal and Bangladesh [20, 52], while all three haplotypes are found in Southeast Asia, including Thailand and Myanmar [44, 51, 53, 54]. Our analysis suggested that Egyptian haplotypes of F. gigantica formed a monophyletic clade sister to those from Asia to the exclusion of Zambian samples (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…taxa in South West of Asia, in India and Bangladesh, near the studied region of Iran, but The Fg type of these flukes was detected in aspermic Fasciola sp. using ITS-RFLP, and also the phylogenetic study with ND1 gene showed that they were placed in F. gigantica complex (8,9). These flukes were probably considered as abnormal F. gigantica with oligozoospermia, which might have occurred because of the aging of flukes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Morphological criteria such as body size and shape are among the traditional and important methods to distinguish between the 2 species, but these methods are not commonly trusted because of the variable range in different species (6 (8,9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over past few decades, high levels of animal movement have been reported in domestic ruminants in several European and Asian countries (Kelley et al, 2016;Vilas et al, 2012); hence genetic analyses are needed to understand the corresponding spread of F. gigantica infections and aid in the development of parasite control strategies (Hayashi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%