2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-00651-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterization of invasive and in situ squamous neoplasia of the vulva and implications for morphologic diagnosis and outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
57
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
57
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) p53-IHC patterns were scored as p53-mutant or p53wild-type, following recent literature [17,18]. p53mutant patterns include basal to para-basal/diffuse overexpression, basal overexpression, null-pattern, or cytoplasmic expression, and these have been reported to strongly correlate with the presence of TP53 mutations [17][18][19]. Presence of any of these patterns, therefore, can be considered supportive of a histological diagnosis of dVIN.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) p53-IHC patterns were scored as p53-mutant or p53wild-type, following recent literature [17,18]. p53mutant patterns include basal to para-basal/diffuse overexpression, basal overexpression, null-pattern, or cytoplasmic expression, and these have been reported to strongly correlate with the presence of TP53 mutations [17][18][19]. Presence of any of these patterns, therefore, can be considered supportive of a histological diagnosis of dVIN.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to accurately discriminate dVIN from non-dysplastic dermatoses, p53-immunohistochemistry (IHC) is commonly used as an ancillary tool [12,13,15]. Mutant patterns of p53-expression are used to support a histological diagnosis of dVIN, as these have been reported to reflect TP53 mutations that characterize dVIN [16][17][18]. However, 17-42% of dVIN can show wild-type p53-expression, which is usually observed in non-dysplastic lesions [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review study published by Maia et al in 2012 highlighted the uniqueness of the Brazilian’s VSCC registry and concluded that the main prognostic factors for VSCC are mainly the patient’s age, treatment, recurrence, and survival, corroborated with the global literature at the time. Nearly a decade later, the main prognostic factors for VSCC remain virtually unchanged and features such as the patient’s age, HPV/16 status, VINs occurrence, tumor stage and grade, tumor size, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, stromal change, and margin status continue to be relevant [ 1 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 16 , 51 , 52 ]. As such, our analysis revealed that the patient’s age (~70 years old), therapy status (~80% of patients did not receive any therapy), VSCC stage (~87% of the tumors were VSCC I/II), FIGO stage (~25% of patients were stage IIIB), tumor recurrence (~50% of patients had recurrence), LN metastasis (~40% of patients did present LN involvement), and mortality rate (~54% of the patients died) were adequate prognostic features for selection of the study population and further correlative studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, to improve prognosis and quality of life for VCSS patients, less invasive therapeutic options are urgently needed. In this context, in-depth studies of the molecular mechanisms underlying VSCC development and progression are necessary to define better and more effective therapeutic options [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%