2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterization of the cloacal microbiota of wild and captive parrots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

14
93
2
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
14
93
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of wild and domesticated mice (Wilson et al, 2006), turkeys (Scupham et al, 2008), parrots (Xenoulis et al, 2010), fruitflies (Cox and Gilmore, 2007) and hydra (Fraune and Bosch, 2007) indicate that members of the same species tend to possess gut bacterial communities of similar taxonomic composition at the phylum or class level regardless of domestication status, with some differences between wild and domestic individuals emerging at shallower phylogenetic resolution. These previous studies have revealed varying effects of domestication on gut bacterial diversity, with increased diversity in wild mice (Wilson et al, 2006) and fruitflies (Cox and Gilmore, 2007) compared with domesticated controls, and decreased diversity in wild versus domesticated parrots (Xenoulis et al, 2010). Our clone library sequencing and pyrosequencing of the zebrafish intestinal microbiota revealed variation between recently caught and domesticated zebrafish, however, the scale of these variations were no larger than those observed between or within different zebrafish lab facilities (Figures 2, 4, and Supplementary Figure S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of wild and domesticated mice (Wilson et al, 2006), turkeys (Scupham et al, 2008), parrots (Xenoulis et al, 2010), fruitflies (Cox and Gilmore, 2007) and hydra (Fraune and Bosch, 2007) indicate that members of the same species tend to possess gut bacterial communities of similar taxonomic composition at the phylum or class level regardless of domestication status, with some differences between wild and domestic individuals emerging at shallower phylogenetic resolution. These previous studies have revealed varying effects of domestication on gut bacterial diversity, with increased diversity in wild mice (Wilson et al, 2006) and fruitflies (Cox and Gilmore, 2007) compared with domesticated controls, and decreased diversity in wild versus domesticated parrots (Xenoulis et al, 2010). Our clone library sequencing and pyrosequencing of the zebrafish intestinal microbiota revealed variation between recently caught and domesticated zebrafish, however, the scale of these variations were no larger than those observed between or within different zebrafish lab facilities (Figures 2, 4, and Supplementary Figure S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in insects, gut microflora has been implicated in adaptation to crop rotation (Chu et al., 2013) and novel food sources (Otani et al., 2014). A large number of studies on various captive animals have revealed that perturbations in the diet result in significant changes in the gut microflora communities (e.g., parrots, Xenoulis et al., 2010; grizzly bears, Schwab et al., 2011; black howler monkeys, Nakamura et al., 2011; and elephant seals and leopard seals, Nelson, Rogers, Carlini, & Brown, 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such bacteria are considered abnormal inhabitants of psittacine birds, so they are viewed by some as pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms in this context 5,6,7 . However, there is controversy about the meaning of the infection in clinically healthy birds, such as whether they are a reservoir of potentially pathogenic bacterial species for other birds and mammals 7,8,9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%