2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2019.107787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterization of the human lens epithelium-derived cell line SRA01/04

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 ). Our previous findings have shown that fluorescence expression intensity units of around 100 (with significant expression p-value) in the Affymetrix and Illumina microarray platforms has served as good indicators that a candidate gene will be validated by independent assays such as RT-PCR 96 , 97 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 ). Our previous findings have shown that fluorescence expression intensity units of around 100 (with significant expression p-value) in the Affymetrix and Illumina microarray platforms has served as good indicators that a candidate gene will be validated by independent assays such as RT-PCR 96 , 97 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Index items extracted from literature were used as cluster markers. The largest cluster #0 was marked as “causing congenital cataract-microcornea syndrome” (Huang and He, 2010 ; Hu et al, 2010 ; Jiang, 2010 ; Li et al, 2010 ) the next cluster #1 was marked as “functional snp”(Gu et al, 2016 ; Wang et al, 2016 ; Anand et al, 2018a ), the second cluster #2 was marked as “cataractous lenses” (Sousounis and Tsonis, 2012 ; Weisschuh et al, 2012 ; Deng and Yuan, 2014 ), the third cluster #3 was marked as “a1 mutation” (Zhu et al, 2010 ; Yu et al, 2012 ; Wu et al, 2017 ), the fourth cluster #4 was marked as “foxe3 mutation” (Wada et al, 2011 ; Anand et al, 2018a ; Plaisancie et al, 2018 ), cluster #5 was marked as “cell adhesion gene pvrl3” (Lachke et al, 2012 ; Weatherbee et al, 2019 ), cluster #6 was marked as “nid1 gene” (Murgiano et al, 2014 ; Osinchuk et al, 2017 ; Braun et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, lens cell lines are more readily used than primary cultures. In the lens field, the three main lines used are HLE-B3 (Makley et al, 2015), SRA01\04 (Ibaraki et al, 1998;Weatherbee et al, 2019) and FHL124 (Dawes et al, 2007b;Reddan et al, 1999;Wormstone et al, 2004). They are all derived from foetal or neonate lenses.…”
Section: Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this system growth, EMT and differentiation have been observed and thus epithelial explants are a tractable system for the study of PCO (Gordon-Thomson et al, 1998;Mansfield et al, 2004;McAvoy and Chamberlain, 1989). Explant cultures can also be established from human lenses (Maidment et al, 2004;Shu and Lovicu, 2017;Smith et al, 2019;Weatherbee et al, 2019). To date, growth, EMT, increased matrix production and contraction have been studied, but differentiation is yet to be observed.…”
Section: In Vivo Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%