2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2010.00575.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterization of Treponema denticola infection-induced bone and soft tissue transcriptional profiles

Abstract: SUMMARYTreponema denticola is associated with subgingival biofilms in adult periodontitis and with acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis. However, the molecular mechanisms by which T. denticola impacts periodontal inflammation and alveolar bone resorption remain unclear. Here, we examined changes in the host transcriptional profiles during a T. denticola infection using a murine calvarial model of inflammation and bone resorption. T. denticola was injected into the subcutaneous soft tissue over the calvaria … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, the observed transcriptional profiles differed between soft and hard tissue, underscoring the need to study separately the individual tissue components in order to dissect the molecular mechanisms involved in the host response to the bacterial challenge. A recent study of T. denticola subcutaneous injections by the same group showed similar results (Bakthavatchalu et al 2010). Unfortunately, no comparisons of the tissue‐specific responses following infection by each of the two pathogens were reported.…”
Section: In Vivo Studiessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Importantly, the observed transcriptional profiles differed between soft and hard tissue, underscoring the need to study separately the individual tissue components in order to dissect the molecular mechanisms involved in the host response to the bacterial challenge. A recent study of T. denticola subcutaneous injections by the same group showed similar results (Bakthavatchalu et al 2010). Unfortunately, no comparisons of the tissue‐specific responses following infection by each of the two pathogens were reported.…”
Section: In Vivo Studiessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In one example, P. gingivalis, T. denticola and T. forsythia were injected into the connective tissue overlying calvarial bone in mice, and mRNA profiling was performed. This led to the identification of a number of inflammatory mediators that were induced in a bacteria-specific pattern [7981]. …”
Section: Calvarial Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microarray studies mentioned above indicated that the gene transcription profiles in inflamed calvarial bone induced by microbial infection were different from the profiles observed in the soft tissue [7981]. Another study has demonstrated the use of this model to examine a bacterially induced soft tissue wound that follows the classic steps of healing, including the migration of fibroblasts into the wounded site, proliferation, production of extracellular matrix and reorganization [85].…”
Section: Calvarial Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a murine calvarial model of inflammation, bone resorption was characterized by distinct host transcriptional profiles (12) (inflammatory mediators, cell adhesion, extracellular matrix [ECM] interactions, and cell cycle components) that demonstrate the acute pathogenicity of T. denticola. These features of aggressive oral pathology have been reported to correlate with the detection of T. denticola aggregated antigenic particles in human atherosclerotic lesions (13) in carotid arterial specimens and atheromatous plaques by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (14); however, a direct causative relation has not been proven.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%