1989
DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08373.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterization of two proteins involved in the excision of the conjugative transposon Tn1545: homologies with other site-specific recombinases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
139
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have never detected virions that appear to have arisen from site specific recombination between the ERs flanking the prophage, a process that could theoretically also result in excision of prophage DNA. Many mobile genetic elements, including lambdoid phages, phage P2, and Tn916, use such a process to generate extrachromosomal forms of DNA (9,17). However, these elements depend on an element-encoded excisionase (e.g., Xis) to reverse the integration pathway, and such a protein is not known to be encoded within CTX .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have never detected virions that appear to have arisen from site specific recombination between the ERs flanking the prophage, a process that could theoretically also result in excision of prophage DNA. Many mobile genetic elements, including lambdoid phages, phage P2, and Tn916, use such a process to generate extrachromosomal forms of DNA (9,17). However, these elements depend on an element-encoded excisionase (e.g., Xis) to reverse the integration pathway, and such a protein is not known to be encoded within CTX .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA fragments to be used as probes for hybridization experiments were the 870-bp HincIl fragment of pT181 for tet(K) (15), the 310-bp ClaI-HpaII fragment of pBC16 for tet(L) (13), the 850-bp ClaI-HindIII fragment of TnJS45 for tet(M) (18), the 1,458-bp HindIII-NdeI fragment of pIP1433 for tet(O) (32), the 900-bp SphI-EcoRI fragment of pCW3 for tetA(P) (31), the 1,100-bp PstI-EcoRI fragment of pCW3 for tetB(P) (31), the 900-bp EcoRI-EcoRV fragment of pNFD13-2 for tet(Q) (20), the 590-bp fragment of pIP811 for tet(S) (5), and the 830-bp TaqI fragment of Tn1545 for int-Tn (23). Restriction endonuclease-generated fragments were separated by electrophoresis in 0.8% low-melting-temperature agarose type VII (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distributions of tet(M) and tet(O) among gram-positive bacteria differed: the tet(M) gene was found, alone or associated with other tet genes, in all of the nine streptococcal isolates and in 219 (96%) of the enterococcal isolates analyzed, whereas tet(O) was detected associated with other tet genes in single isolates of E. faecalis and of S. milleri. The tet(M) gene is common among enterococci and streptococci, where it is part of broad-host-range conjugative transposons and is thus usually associated with int-Tn, the gene encoding the integrase of these elements (23,24). In contrast, tet(O) is rarely encountered in these genera, where it is carried by conjugative plasmids (33,35,37) (19).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the molecular mechanisms proposed for movement of transposons cannot apply to the conjugative elements; lambda and other prophages provide a better model for their movement (12,13). The recent finding that the TnJ545 gene required for excision of this element has homology with the lambda integrase family of proteins supports this idea (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%