2008
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2008.52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular clock debate: Time dependency of molecular rate estimates for mtDNA: this is not the time for wishful thinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IM; mismatch distributions – see below) provide strong support for the HPD rate estimate, and for the similar molecular rates calculated from other species over Holocene timeframes and from pedigree data [16][18],[23],[24]. Although controversial [25],[26], as they are an order of magnitude or more faster than ‘traditional’ substitution rate estimates derived from interspecific phylogenetic datasets or the fossil record [24], these high intraspecific estimates have been quite consistent and are now well supported [16][18],[23],[24],[26].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…IM; mismatch distributions – see below) provide strong support for the HPD rate estimate, and for the similar molecular rates calculated from other species over Holocene timeframes and from pedigree data [16][18],[23],[24]. Although controversial [25],[26], as they are an order of magnitude or more faster than ‘traditional’ substitution rate estimates derived from interspecific phylogenetic datasets or the fossil record [24], these high intraspecific estimates have been quite consistent and are now well supported [16][18],[23],[24],[26].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The use of molecular clocks has been extensively debated; for details see Bromham and Penny (2003), Hedges and Kumar (2003), Graur and Martin (2004), Bandelt (2008), Ho and Larson (2006) and Howell and Howell (2008). We acknowledge the uncertainties surrounding calibration points and estimated times of divergence should be interpreted with much caution.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysis and Datingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, non-synonymous substitutions were shown to be more frequent in terminal branches of the human mtDNA tree [22], [23], [24] and in younger clades compared to older clades [25]. There appears to be a continuous change in the mtDNA substitution rate with the slowest rate in between humans and apes, intermediate rate among human populations and the highest rate in pedigrees [13], [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Until recently, a linear molecular clock for the human mtDNA has been assumed and applied for dating the nodes of the tree [9]. On the other hand, time-dependence of the rate of accumulation of new mutations has been proposed based on several lines of evidence [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. Notably, the phrase “accumulation of new mutations” can refer to different levels of genetic variation: it can be related to DNA replication errors left unrepaired in meiosis (observed in pedigree studies), however, in population studies it refers to the level of polymorphism and in interspecies comparisons to the number of fixed differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%