“…(Legend on facing page.) may help to select the appropriate initiating methionine but does not encode, and therefore cannot supply, an initiating methionine (Blumenthal, 1995); therefore, the initiating methionine must be intrinsically provided by the MOCS1B ORF+ Because the invertebrate MOCS1B ORFs lack a candidate initiating methionine that would produce a protein including the presumably essential residues, it is highly unlikely that functional MOCS1B protein can be independently translated in these species+ Though modestly transcribed, Northern analyses in human (Reiss et al+, 1998b), as well as in mouse, opossum, and chicken (Fig+ 3) show a single transcript size consistent with mRNAs containing both ORFs, but not smaller transcripts possibly encoding either MOCS1 subunit alone+ It is therefore likely that in vertebrates, as in invertebrates, that MOCS1B is not independently translated because (1) there is no evidence for a small, MOCS1B-specific transcript in four diverse vertebrates, (2) there is no conserved MOCS1B translation initiation codon (see above), and (3) the conventional scanning ribosome translational model (reviewed in Kozak, 1999) only predicts efficient translation of MOCS1A but not MOCS1B from the bicistronic transcripts+ Consequently, we therefore hypothesize that the only protein translated from the bicistronic Type I splice form is monofunctional MOCS1A protein+ Evidence that MOCS1A protein is indeed translated from the bicistronic (Type I) transcript can be seen by noting that the codons specific to this splice form are particularly well conserved (e+g+, the Gly-Gly C-terminal dipeptide; Fig+ 2C and see below), attesting to their protein-coding function+ We envision that the MOCS1B ORF of the bicistronic transcript constitutes an extended 39 UTR, similar to NESP55-GNAS1 transcripts that are thought to produce only NESP55 protein but not G s a due to the lack of an initiating methionine for the latter ORF (Hayward et al+, 1998;Ischia et al+, 1997;Peters et al+, 1999)+ In conclusion, because phylogenetic (this paper) and human mutation (Reiss et al+, 1998b) data imply that MOCS1B protein must be produced from this locus, we propose that the MOCS1B ORF is only translated from the no-nonsense transcripts (Types II-V) as part of a fused MOCS1A-MOCS1B multifunctional protein (Fig+ 2B)+ Recent studies indicate that gene fusion to form multidomain proteins is relatively common in evolution (Doolittle, 1999;Enright et al+, 1999;Marcotte et al+, 1999aMarcotte et al+, , 1999b, including in other eukaryotic genes involved in Mo metabolism )+ Gene fusion begins with a recombination event juxtaposing two ORFs such that transcription of the upstream ORF continues uninterrupted through the downstream ORF+ Should Figure 1+ The Mmus panel shows the patterns from a variety of tissues: B: brain, H: heart, L: liver, and T: testis+ B: Schematic representation of mRNA splice forms and their respective putative protein products+ Genomic organization of human (exons 8-10), fruit fly (exons 3 and 4), and nematode (exons 5-7) are shown at left+ Green shading indicates MOCS1A sequences and blue designates MOCS1B+ The red vertical line represents a nonsense codon that terminates the MOCS1A ORF+ Roman numerals (I-III) in human designate splice donor choices into exon 10; numer...…”