1991
DOI: 10.1101/gad.5.12b.2386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular cloning of a member of a new class of low-molecular-weight GTP-binding proteins.

Abstract: We report the cloning of a low-molecular-weight GTP-binding protein that appears to be the first member of a new class of G proteins. This G protein was cloned from the HT4 neural cell line and has the closest homology to the tab, sec4, and yptl members of the low-molecular-weight (LMW) G-protein family. The amino acid sequence identity is only 30% with these other LMW G proteins, but in the four conserved GTP-binding domains, amino acid identity increases to 50-100%. A unique feature that distinguishes this G… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because there was an in-frame termination codon (T416AA) upstream of A503TG in this clone, this ATG is most likely to serve the initiation codon. The coding region of the former truncated clone contains 208 amino acids (31), whereas that of this clone consisted of 259 amino acids and its calculated molecular weight was 29,128. Because Rah was most similar to Rab family proteins among small GTPase families and its amino acid sequence was identical to that of mouse Rab34 (accession number BC038638, the data of which were submitted while we were submitting this report), we compared its amino acid sequence with those of several other Rab family proteins (Fig.…”
Section: Sequence and Functional Domains Of Rah-becausementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because there was an in-frame termination codon (T416AA) upstream of A503TG in this clone, this ATG is most likely to serve the initiation codon. The coding region of the former truncated clone contains 208 amino acids (31), whereas that of this clone consisted of 259 amino acids and its calculated molecular weight was 29,128. Because Rah was most similar to Rab family proteins among small GTPase families and its amino acid sequence was identical to that of mouse Rab34 (accession number BC038638, the data of which were submitted while we were submitting this report), we compared its amino acid sequence with those of several other Rab family proteins (Fig.…”
Section: Sequence and Functional Domains Of Rah-becausementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rah is a small GTPase postulated to be a member of Rab family due to the similarity of its effector domain and C-terminal sequences to those of several Rab proteins (31). Because only a truncated cDNA lacking the sequence encoding N-terminal portion was available (31), we have cloned in the present study the cDNA containing the entire coding region of mouse Rah.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a reasonable hypothesis compatible with these data is that the carboxyl-terminal cysteine is palmitoylated, and that the adjacent cysteine is geranylgeranylated. A novel carboxyl-terminal sequence, C-C-P, is found in Rah, a mammalian small GTP-binding protein related to Rho proteins (99). It is tempting to speculate that this may represent a new prenylation motif.…”
Section: The Ras Superfamilymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many additional proteins are modified with one or two 20-carbon geranylgeranyl groups (Rilling et al, 1990); these proteins include many guanine nucleotide-binding proteins involved in cell signalling (Mumby et al, 1990;Kinsella and Maltese, 1991;Khosravi-Far et al, 1991). In addition, an unidentified mammalian protein appears to be covalently modified with an isopentenyladenosine moiety (Faust and Dice, 1991), and genetic evidence suggests that other isoprenoid modifications may also exist (Morimoto et al, 1991). Prenylation is essential for the subsequent processing, intracellular localization, and biological activity of Ras and other prenylated proteins (Hancock et al, 1989;Schafer et al, 1989), suggesting that the prenyl group is required to direct the protein to the cellular locale where it can perform its biological function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%