2010
DOI: 10.3199/iscb.5.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular cytogenetic analysis in seven species of Lachenalia (Liliaceae) with the chromosome numbers of 2n=18, 22, 23, 26 and 28 by DAPI staining and FISH using 5S rDNA and 18S rDNA probes

Abstract: Molecular cytogenetic analysis in seven species of Lachenalia (Liliaceae) with 2n=18, 22, 23, 26 and 28 was studied using DAPI staining and fl uorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Lachenalia latimerae (2n=18), L. juncifolia (2n=22) and L. zeyheri (2n=23) would be considered as diploids which had basic chromosome numbers of x=9, 11 and 11, respectively. They showed similarities in the characters of DAPI bands and FISH signals of 5S rDNA and 18S rDNA sites. Lachenalia aloides var. vanzyliae (2n=28) and L. or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, L. longituba, which have same chromosome number and diploid (2n=28, x=14) as L. congesta included in the first group (Hamatani 2011). Because L. longituba also did not have clear DAPIpositive bands, however had two FISH signals of 5S rDNA sites on distal position of the long arms of small chromosomes (Hamatani et al 2010). Thus, these FISH data suggested that despite L. congesta and L. longituba had common chromosome feature (2n=28, x=14) and this is unique character among Lachenalia, they are belong to another group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, L. longituba, which have same chromosome number and diploid (2n=28, x=14) as L. congesta included in the first group (Hamatani 2011). Because L. longituba also did not have clear DAPIpositive bands, however had two FISH signals of 5S rDNA sites on distal position of the long arms of small chromosomes (Hamatani et al 2010). Thus, these FISH data suggested that despite L. congesta and L. longituba had common chromosome feature (2n=28, x=14) and this is unique character among Lachenalia, they are belong to another group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Nine species and three varieties of Lachenalia had the chromosome number of 2n=28 (Spies 2004, Hamatani 2011. Among them, seven species and three varieties confirmed as tetraploid (X=7), whereas L. longituba could be identified as a diploid (X=14) because this species had 14 pairs of chromosomes characterized by their individual features, and had two FISH signals of 5S rDNA sites and 18S rDNA sites, respectively (Hamatani et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interspecific variation in the distribution of DAPI +ve signals [65,67] and CMA +ve signals [67] have been reported in Muscari. Varied distribution of DAPI +ve signals has also been reported in species of Lachenalia [68,69]. In Drimia (tribe Urgineeae), CMA +ve /DAPI −ve signals were associated with nucleolar chromosomes, with some interspecific variations in additional signals [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%