2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02787.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of an acquired minute supernumerary marker chromosome as the sole abnormality in a case clinically diagnosed as atypical Philadelphia‐negative chronic myelogenous leukaemia

Abstract: A case of chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML) in a 48-year-old man is reported. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a Philadelphia-negative CML with an acquired small supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC) 11 as the sole abnormality. The derivative chromosome 11 was studied in detail using molecular cytogenetic methods; fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using centromere- and region-specific probes for chromosome 11, microdissection, micro-comparative genomic hybridization (micro-CG… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies the accuracy of the MCB technique in the determination of chromosomal breakpoints has been proven by comparison with M-FISH (Kuechler et al, 2003), CGH (Starke et al, 2001a;Tönnies et al, 2001;Stumm et al, 2002), microdissection plus reverse painting (Starke et al, 2001a, b) and locus and/or region-specific probes (Starke et al, 2001a;Liehr et al, 2002a;Weise et al, 2002). Two sets of chromosome specific MCB probes were assembled and used simultaneously before .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies the accuracy of the MCB technique in the determination of chromosomal breakpoints has been proven by comparison with M-FISH (Kuechler et al, 2003), CGH (Starke et al, 2001a;Tönnies et al, 2001;Stumm et al, 2002), microdissection plus reverse painting (Starke et al, 2001a, b) and locus and/or region-specific probes (Starke et al, 2001a;Liehr et al, 2002a;Weise et al, 2002). Two sets of chromosome specific MCB probes were assembled and used simultaneously before .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of those, only a very small subset does not consist of consecutive chromosomal material, but has complex intrachromosomal rearrangements (Fang et al, 1995;Schuffenhauer et al, 1996;Callen et al, 1999, cases A and C;Röthlisberger et al, 2000;Starke et al, 2001Starke et al, , 2003bDaniel and Malafiej, 2003, case 5).…”
Section: Complex Rearranged Ssmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review combined with the highly informative recently described molecular cytogenetic approaches Trifonov et al, 2003;Starke et al, 2001Starke et al, , 2003b should it make more feasible for the clinician to do genetic counseling of parents expecting children with de novo sSMC.…”
Section: Towards a Clinical Correlation Of Ssmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FISH-banding technique (9) multitude multicolor banding (mMCB) was chosen as it has proven its ability and reliability in previous studies and is the only one which has been systematically adjusted with other FISH-techniques (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). However, as all (multicolor) FISH techniques based on whole or partial chromosome painting probes, also mMCB is not completely reliable concerning the subtelomeric and subcentromeric chromosomal regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%