2000
DOI: 10.1006/geno.1999.6092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Cytogenetic Resources for Chromosome 4 and Comparative Analysis of Phylogenetic Chromosome IV in Great Apes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GGO3 has been identified as the homolog of HSA4 by comparative banding, comparative mapping and chromosome painting (ISCN, 1995;Stanyon et al, 1986;Sawyer, 1991;Jauch et al, 1992;Ried et al, 1993). HSA4 and GGO3 appear to differ by only a pericentric inversion (Yunis and Prakash, 1982;Marzella et al, 2000). In this study, Zoo-FISH with an HSA4 painting probe confirmed the deletion but did not reveal a translocation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…GGO3 has been identified as the homolog of HSA4 by comparative banding, comparative mapping and chromosome painting (ISCN, 1995;Stanyon et al, 1986;Sawyer, 1991;Jauch et al, 1992;Ried et al, 1993). HSA4 and GGO3 appear to differ by only a pericentric inversion (Yunis and Prakash, 1982;Marzella et al, 2000). In this study, Zoo-FISH with an HSA4 painting probe confirmed the deletion but did not reveal a translocation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The comparison of G-banded chromosomes and molecular cytogenetic approaches revealed that the karyotype of humans and orangutans are more similar to an ancestral hominoid karyotype than that of the African great apes (Dutrillaux, 1979;Yunis and Prakash, 1982;Nickerson and Nelson, 1998;Marzella et al, 2000;Müller and Wienberg, 2000;Kehrer-Sawatzki et al, 2002). Also, the pericentric inversion of PTR10 is the derived form and the breakpoints are divergent from the inversion of the homologous chromosome in the gorilla (Nickerson and Nelson, 1998; this study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Human and chimpanzee karyotypes differ by one chromosomal fusion that gave rise to human chromosome 2 (HSA2) from two ancestral chromosomes coupled to the inactivation of one of the two centromeres, at least nine pericentric inversions, and in the content of constitutive heterochromatin (Yunis et al 1980;IJdo et al 1991;Baldini et al 1993;Nickerson and Nelson 1998). Seven of these inversions, mapping to human chromosomes 4, 5, 9, 12, 15, 16, and 17, are specific to the chimpanzee lineage (Marzella et al 2000;Kehrer-Sawatzki et al 2002;Locke et al 2003;Goidts et al 2005;Kehrer-Sawatzki et al 2005a,b,c;Shimada et al 2005;Szamalek et al 2005), while the remaining two, mapping to HSA1 and HSA18, appeared in the human lineage after separation from the chimpanzee (Yunis and Prakash 1982;McConkey 1997;Dennehey et al 2004;Weise et al 2005;Szamalek et al 2006). These reorganized structures became fixed during evolution either by providing an advantage or by mere genetic drift.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%