2019
DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2019.1614525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular detection of Salmonella serovars Enteritidis, Heidelberg and Typhimurium directly from pre-enriched poultry samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have already demonstrated that PCR methods can be used to detect foodborne pathogens in chicken and other poultry samples (Alonso et al, 2011;Park et al, 2014). However, they have been carried out only after bacterial preenrichment and/or isolation (Borges et al, 2019;Souza et al, 2019;Borges et al, 2020). The present study demonstrated that Salmonella, Campylobacter, and C. perfringens can be detected directly from broilers' cecal samples obtained in slaughter houses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have already demonstrated that PCR methods can be used to detect foodborne pathogens in chicken and other poultry samples (Alonso et al, 2011;Park et al, 2014). However, they have been carried out only after bacterial preenrichment and/or isolation (Borges et al, 2019;Souza et al, 2019;Borges et al, 2020). The present study demonstrated that Salmonella, Campylobacter, and C. perfringens can be detected directly from broilers' cecal samples obtained in slaughter houses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Thus, DNA-based methods like real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) have been increasingly developed and used to detect and quantify foodborne pathogens in the poultry production chain (Souza et al, 2019;Waldman et al, 2020). Other important advantage of DNA-based methods is the possibility of performing qualitative and quantitative analysis of food pathogens in biological samples simply with prior enrichment or even directly from biological samples (Albini et al, 2008;Rodgers et al, 2012;Park et al, 2014;Ricke et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA‐based detection methods such as PCR can quickly obtain test results and greatly shorten clinical outbreak time. In recent years, different PCR based detection methods for some food‐borne pathogens have been developed (Alarcon, Garcia‐Canas, Cifuentes, Gonzalez, & Aznar, ; Pierce et al., ; Souza et al., ; Zhou et al., ). Traditional simplex PCR methods cannot detect multiple pathogens at the same time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] Consequently, various molecular techniques such as ELISA and PCR procedures were introduced to provide higher sensitivity and selectivity in comparison with conventional microbiological isolation methods. 11 However, those techniques are still expensive and time consuming methodologies with a reported limit of detection for Salmonella of 10 4 to 10 5 CFU ml À1 and 10 4 CFU ml À1 for ELISA, 12 and PCR, 13 respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%