2022
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.895140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Detection of Zoonotic and Veterinary Pathogenic Bacteria in Pet Dogs and Their Parasitizing Ticks in Junggar Basin, North-Western China

Abstract: Despite the recognized epidemiological importance of ticks as vectors for pathogens that cause numerous zoonotic and veterinary diseases, data regarding the pathogens of pet dogs and their parasitic ticks in the Junggar Basin are scarce. In this study, a total of 178 blood samples and 436 parasitic ticks were collected from pet dogs in Junggar Basin, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (XUAR), north-western China. All ticks were identified as Rhipicephalus turanicus sensu stricto (s.s.) according to morphological… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…was identified in 0.58% goats and vegetation ticks (H. longicornis) [17], 1.32% of vegetation or sheep ticks (D. nuttalli) [18], 26.5% cattle and sheep ticks (H. anatolicum, D. nuttalli, and D. marginatus) [16], or 89.0% vegetation or sheep ticks (D. nuttalli) [3] depending on the studies. Brucella prevalence in dog ticks ranged from 12.4% in Lao PDR (R. sanguineus) [19] to 16.74% in China (R. turanicus) [20]. The spatial heterogenicity of Brucella prevalence in ticks underlines the complexity of brucellosis in the different epidemiological scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…was identified in 0.58% goats and vegetation ticks (H. longicornis) [17], 1.32% of vegetation or sheep ticks (D. nuttalli) [18], 26.5% cattle and sheep ticks (H. anatolicum, D. nuttalli, and D. marginatus) [16], or 89.0% vegetation or sheep ticks (D. nuttalli) [3] depending on the studies. Brucella prevalence in dog ticks ranged from 12.4% in Lao PDR (R. sanguineus) [19] to 16.74% in China (R. turanicus) [20]. The spatial heterogenicity of Brucella prevalence in ticks underlines the complexity of brucellosis in the different epidemiological scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, Brucella spp. was a prevalent pathogen in Rhipicephalus sanguineus parasitizing dogs in Lao PDR [19] and in Rhipicephalus turanicus and canine blood samples in North-Western China [20], thus posing owners at risk of contracting brucellosis and raising important public health implications [19,20]. Furthermore, adult female D. marginatus or D. nuttalli collected from sheep, cattle, or vegetation in China were demonstrated by both molecular and culture methods to transovarially and transstadially transmit B. melitensis and B. abortus [3,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously reported, R. sibirica has been reported in Xinjiang as well as elsewhere in China; however, almost all of them are R. sibirica subsp. sibirica or only identified to species level [ 23 26 ]. So far as we know, this may be the second report of R. sibirica subsp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, more than 20 Rickettsia species have been identified among diverse ticks ( 41 ) as hosts of ticks, dogs, and cats are naturally at risk for rickettsial infection. To date, several investigations have been performed, and at least six Rickettsia species, R. felis ( 13 , 14 ), R. massiliae , Candidatus R. barbariae ( 15 ), R. conorii ( 16 ), R. raoultii , and Candidatus R. tarasevichiae ( 13 ) have been identified in dogs. In addition, the positive rate of Rickettsia infection in dogs ranged from 0.8 to 8.0%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, limited studies have been performed to determine the presence of vector-borne zoonotic pathogens in companion cats and dogs. Regarding SFGR, Rickettsia felis ( 13 , 14 ), Rickettsia massiliae ( 15 ), Rickettsia conorii ( 16 ), Rickettsia raoultii , and Candidatus Rickettsia tarasevichiae ( 13 ) have been identified in dogs. Regarding Bartonella , Bar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%