2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10689-006-9001-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1: 2 years experience

Abstract: Our experience of providing an NF1 gene diagnostic mutation detection service as part of the U.K. Genetic Testing Network (UKGTN) is presented. A total of 169 unrelated individuals suspected of having neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) were referred for NF1 diagnostic testing over a 2 year period. Mutation analysis of the entire NF1 coding region and the flanking splice sites was carried out, and included the use of a combination of FISH, dHPLC and MLPA. Possible disease causing mutations were identified in 109 (6… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

10
47
3
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
10
47
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This represents an 83% mutation detection rate, which is comparable to previously reported mutation rates for this gene, although it is still significantly lower than the mutation detection rate from the study by Messiaen et al (2000). [37][38][39] These heterozygous inherited lesions comprised 36 truncating mutations and 2 missense mutations, of which 13 were novel ( Table 1). All germline mutations were subsequently confirmed by identification in the corresponding tumour DNA samples.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This represents an 83% mutation detection rate, which is comparable to previously reported mutation rates for this gene, although it is still significantly lower than the mutation detection rate from the study by Messiaen et al (2000). [37][38][39] These heterozygous inherited lesions comprised 36 truncating mutations and 2 missense mutations, of which 13 were novel ( Table 1). All germline mutations were subsequently confirmed by identification in the corresponding tumour DNA samples.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…(2007) (78%) and Van Minkelen et al. (2014) (81%), possibly due to the large size of the Dutch patient cohort screened in those studies and the diversity of the techniques used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Splicing mutations represented the second most prominent class of mutations (27/126 – 21%), in agreement with previous reports (Griffiths et al. 2007; van Minkelen et al. 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore looked for other missense variants affecting this position. Our cohort of genetically confirmed NF1 patients also included three related patients (Family 4) and one sporadic case (Family 5) carrying the already reported c.5426G4T p.(Arg1809Leu) substitution 8 (Supplementary Table 1). In addition, a novel c.5426G4C p.(Arg1809Pro) substitution was present in a further sporadic case (Supplementary Table 1; Family 6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%