2009
DOI: 10.1603/029.102.0237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Diagnostic for Boll Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Based on Amplification of Three Species-Specific Microsatellites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the availability of diagnostic markers to resolve forms is important in helping management officials determine whether the form of boll weevil captured is a threat to cultivated cotton (Roehrdanz et al 2001). Molecular markers have been developed to discriminate boll weevils from other weevil species, such as the pepper weevil (Anthonomus eugenii), and are completely diagnostic, simple and economical to use (Kim et al 2009). However, marker development for use as a diagnostic tool to distinguish the three boll weevil forms has been problematic, in part due to difficulties in obtaining adequate geographic sampling of populations within the TW (Roehrdanz 2001) as well as Mexican (Scataglini et al 2006) ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the availability of diagnostic markers to resolve forms is important in helping management officials determine whether the form of boll weevil captured is a threat to cultivated cotton (Roehrdanz et al 2001). Molecular markers have been developed to discriminate boll weevils from other weevil species, such as the pepper weevil (Anthonomus eugenii), and are completely diagnostic, simple and economical to use (Kim et al 2009). However, marker development for use as a diagnostic tool to distinguish the three boll weevil forms has been problematic, in part due to difficulties in obtaining adequate geographic sampling of populations within the TW (Roehrdanz 2001) as well as Mexican (Scataglini et al 2006) ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%