2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Technologies and Management for Computing, Communication, Controls, Energy and Mate 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icstm.2017.8089213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular docking analysis of imidazole derivatives and polybenzimidazole analogs as inhibitors of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and xanthine oxidase (XO)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3D structure of hSOD (PDB ID: 2C9Vwith a resolution of 1.07 Aᵒ); hPDE 9 (PDB ID: 4Y86 with a resolution of 2.01 Aᵒ) and hDPP 4 (PDB ID: 4A5S with a resolution of 1.62 Aᵒ) was retrieved from PDB database. “A” chain of these enzymes was prepared individually by removing other chains, ligands and even crystallographically observed water molecules by applying the UCSF Chimera software tool (Regents, University of California, San Francisco, USA) [ 13 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D structure of hSOD (PDB ID: 2C9Vwith a resolution of 1.07 Aᵒ); hPDE 9 (PDB ID: 4Y86 with a resolution of 2.01 Aᵒ) and hDPP 4 (PDB ID: 4A5S with a resolution of 1.62 Aᵒ) was retrieved from PDB database. “A” chain of these enzymes was prepared individually by removing other chains, ligands and even crystallographically observed water molecules by applying the UCSF Chimera software tool (Regents, University of California, San Francisco, USA) [ 13 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical structures of 25 ligands ( P. pusilla fruit constituents) namely (i) 6‐oxabicyclo [3,1,0] hexan‐2‐one (CID 242082), (ii) 4H‐pyran‐4‐one, 2,3‐dihydro‐3,5‐dihydroxy‐6‐methyl (CID 119838), (iii) 1‐butoxypropan‐2‐yl 2‐methylbutanoate (CID 91693251), (iv) glycerin (CID 753), (v) dimethylamine, N ‐(neopentyloxy) (CID 548341), (vi) tricyclo [2,2,1,0 (2,6)] heptane, 1,3,3‐trimethyl (CID 79022), (vii) benzene, 1‐ethynyl‐4‐fluoro (CID 11171265), (viii) 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural (CID 237332), (ix) phenol, 2‐methoxy‐3‐(2‐propenyl) (CID 596373), (x) cetene (CID 12395), (xi) 7‐epi‐ trans ‐sesquisabinene hydrate (CID 100930863), (xii) Z‐10‐pentadecen‐1‐ol (CID 5364483), (xiii) dodecanoic acid, methyl ester (CID 8139), (xiv) trichloroacetic acid, 4‐tetradecyl ester (CID 534423), (xv) decanoic acid, 3‐methyl (CID 143696), (xvi) methyl tetradecanoate (CID 31284), (xvii) 3‐deoxy‐ d ‐mannoic lactone (CID 541561), (xviii) hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester (CID 8181), (xix) benzenepropanoic acid, 3,5‐ bis (1,1‐dimethylethyl)‐4‐hydroxy‐, methyl ester (CID 62603), (xx) n ‐hexadecanoic acid (CID 985), (xxi) 1‐formyl‐2,5‐dimethoxy‐6,9,10‐trimethyl‐anthracene (CID 626348), (xxii) 9‐octadecenoic acid, methyl ester (CID 5280590), (xxiii) methyl stearate (CID 8201), and (xxiv) 9,12‐octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z) were downloaded from PubMed. One more unavailable structure of ligand (β‐allyloxypropionic acid) and the selected 24 ligands were drawn by using ChemBio Draw Ultra 12.0 and the molecular mechanics (MM2) energy minimization of ligands was performed by ChemBio 3D Ultra 12.0, according to the reported protocol (Vijayakumar et al, 2017). Furthermore, the prepared ligands were converted into the pdbqt file format using the Open Babel free software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical structures of 25 ligands (P. pusilla fruit constituents) namely (i) 6-oxabicyclo [3,1,0] hexan-2-one (CID 242082), (ii) 4Hpyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl (CID 119838), (iii) 1-butoxypropan-2-yl 2-methylbutanoate (CID 91693251), 1-formyl-2,5-dimethoxy-6,9,10-trimethyl-anthracene (CID 626348), (xxii) 9-octadecenoic acid, methyl ester (CID 5280590), (xxiii) methyl stearate (CID 8201), and (xxiv) 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z) were downloaded from PubMed. One more unavailable structure of ligand (β-allyloxypropionic acid) and the selected 24 ligands were drawn by using ChemBio Draw Ultra 12.0 and the molecular mechanics (MM2) energy minimization of ligands was performed by ChemBio 3D Ultra 12.0, according to the reported protocol (Vijayakumar et al, 2017).…”
Section: Ligand Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pubchem.com). Then the selected ligands were drawn by using ChemBioDraw Ultra 12.0 and the molecular mechanics (MM2) energy minimization of ligands was performed by ChemBio 3D Ultra 12.0, according to the reported protocol 24 . These minimized energy structures were used for further AutoDock study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In silico experimental analysis ligands was performed by ChemBio 3D Ultra 12.0, according to the reported protocol. 24 These minimized energy structures were used for further AutoDock study.…”
Section: 7mentioning
confidence: 99%