2012
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201200104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Drivers of Base Flipping During Sequence‐Specific DNA Methylation

Abstract: One step at a time: Substrates containing nucleotide analogues lacking sequence-specific contacts to the C5 methyltransferase M.HhaI were used to probe the role of individual interactions in effecting conformational transitions during base flipping. A segregation of duties, that is, specific recognition and chemomechanical force for base flipping and active site assembly, within the enzyme is confirmed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we suggest that the loop does not act to directly eject the base from the helix but instead closes once the base has begun to vacate the DNA helix. Our recent work using miscognate sites 23 (sites with a single-base pair substitution) suggests that upon location of the target sequence, compression of the protein domains around the DNA destabilizes the target base pair, in agreement with several molecular dynamics models of the flipping process. 2,19,20 The observed decrease in the flipping rate with the W41F mutant validates the computational predictions that cofactor binding facilitates compression of the domains to destabilize the target cytosine.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Thus, we suggest that the loop does not act to directly eject the base from the helix but instead closes once the base has begun to vacate the DNA helix. Our recent work using miscognate sites 23 (sites with a single-base pair substitution) suggests that upon location of the target sequence, compression of the protein domains around the DNA destabilizes the target base pair, in agreement with several molecular dynamics models of the flipping process. 2,19,20 The observed decrease in the flipping rate with the W41F mutant validates the computational predictions that cofactor binding facilitates compression of the domains to destabilize the target cytosine.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The decay parameters reported here are quantitatively consistent with previously reported fluorescence intensity measurements. 14,19,20 Moreover, the E94W and E94W/W41F mutants are observed to have essentially identical decay signals when the enzyme is saturated with cofactor (see sTable 2 of the Supporting Information). This demonstrates that the fluorescence of the native tryptophan is efficiently quenched by cofactor binding and signal changes in the ternary complexes of the E94W mutant are solely from the tryptophan engineered into the loop.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Timeresolved measurements were taken on an Applied Photophysics SX.18MV apparatus as described previously. 14,20,21 NMR Spectroscopy. All experiments were conducted at 25 °C either on a Bruker 800 MHz UltraShield Plus II NMR spectrometer equipped with a four-channel ( 1 H/ 13 .…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research shows that closure of the catalytic loop occurs after base flipping [9, 58] and that the enzyme utilizes the hydrogen bonds between Gln237 and Ser87 to lock the flipped base. Other research studies indicate that target base flipping and closure of the mobile catalytic loop occur simultaneously [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%