1999
DOI: 10.1121/1.425793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics approach for a sonoluminescing bubble

Abstract: Up to now the numerical calculations for the converging shock or compression wave model of sonoluminescence have been based primarily on continuum methods. Here an alternative approach by molecular dynamics simulation is shown to be feasible with today’s computer memory and speed. Both approaches are compared. Results of the simulations are presented for the scaling behavior with the number of particles, for different boundary conditions (spherical and ellipsoidal bubbles) and for one and more species in the b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar calculations with more than a million hard sphere particles in a bubble collapsed at a Mach number of about 1.5 confirm the strong increase in temperature towards the centre of the collapsed bubble in this kind of gas ( [32], figure 21). Moreover, a comparison with a continuum mechanics calculation based on Euler's equations showed reasonable agreement [33][34][35][36]. The differences (a steep shock for the Euler equations and the singularity at the bubble centre) can be explained by the dissipation missing in the Euler equations but being naturally included in the MD calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar calculations with more than a million hard sphere particles in a bubble collapsed at a Mach number of about 1.5 confirm the strong increase in temperature towards the centre of the collapsed bubble in this kind of gas ( [32], figure 21). Moreover, a comparison with a continuum mechanics calculation based on Euler's equations showed reasonable agreement [33][34][35][36]. The differences (a steep shock for the Euler equations and the singularity at the bubble centre) can be explained by the dissipation missing in the Euler equations but being naturally included in the MD calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The hybrid method was extended by Metten et al [33][34][35][36][47][48][49] through the coupling of the bubble interior, which is modelled by MD with hard spheres, with the continuum Rayleigh-Plesset (RP) equation for the surrounding liquid. The coupling of the two fluid parts is effected by determining the MD gas pressure inside the bubble and applying the boundary pressure as input gas pressure to the RP equation (RP-MD model).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%