2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics simulation of a water nano-droplet on graphene oxide surface at high temperature: Evaporation or spreading?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the aforementioned simulation works, only Dutta et al 32 studied the wettability of graphite by extrapolating the Θ−1/r graph at various temperatures. The linear dependence of the CA on temperature that they reported is not, however, in agreement with the experimental data of Friedman et al 35 In fact, with the exception of two papers, 32,38 very little research has been done to investigate temperature dependence of the wetting states of nanodroplets on graphitic surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Among the aforementioned simulation works, only Dutta et al 32 studied the wettability of graphite by extrapolating the Θ−1/r graph at various temperatures. The linear dependence of the CA on temperature that they reported is not, however, in agreement with the experimental data of Friedman et al 35 In fact, with the exception of two papers, 32,38 very little research has been done to investigate temperature dependence of the wetting states of nanodroplets on graphitic surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…65 The contribution of non-bonded van der Waals interactions is calculated using the Lennard-Jones potentials, with a cutoff of 10 Å. 66 All particle-mesh Ewald (PME) calculations are carried out with a 1.0 nm cutoff for direct space nonbonded calculations, a grid spacing of 0.3 nm, and sixth-order B-spline interpolation. 67 The simulations are performed in the canonical ensemble.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current documents in terms of this issue can be generally categorized into three types, including MD simulations, laboratory experiments, and analytical models. From the microscopic viewpoint, surface–molecule interactions at the nanoscale are the inherent cause altering its flow behavior compared with that in the bulk state. , As a result, to pursue the precision, MD simulation is identified as the most suitable approach, and simulation results are generated from intermolecular interactions calculated by the classic Newton mechanics principles. However, quite lengthy computation times and expensive costs on the calculation resources are limitations of MD methods. More importantly, once the application scenario varies, a completely new simulation system is required to be constructed, which is a waste of time and becomes unfavorable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%