2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2860(00)00459-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics simulation of trp-repressor/operator complex: analysis of hydrogen bond patterns of protein–DNA interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation studies (34,38,80,120,128,132,146) in general have supported the crystallographic/NMR observations on water-mediated hydrogen bonds.…”
Section: Water In Protein-dna Bindingsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Simulation studies (34,38,80,120,128,132,146) in general have supported the crystallographic/NMR observations on water-mediated hydrogen bonds.…”
Section: Water In Protein-dna Bindingsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…9 On the other hand, it was observed, that the hydration of the uncomplexed trp operator does not seem to be preorganized or kinetically stabilized to match in the complex. 24 Two short molecular dynamics simulations 25,26 of the trp-repressor operator complex performed previously reproduced well the water-mediated contacts observed in crystal 5 structures of the trp-repressor operator complex. In their time scale of simulations, they could not present dynamic properties of the water-mediated contacts.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Two short MD simulations 25,26 have proven their ability to reproduce water-mediated contacts of trprepressor operator complex as seen in crystal 5 structure. Though, in these simulations all crystal water molecules were removed, the applied simulation protocols allowed the adjustment of these contacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first studies utilizing this technique involved analysis of correlated motions in cytochrome c (McCammon, 1984), ribonuclease A with two different substrates (Brünger et al, 1985), HIV-1 protease (Harte et al, 1990;Harte et al, 1992;Swaminathan et al, 1991), and BPTI (Ichiye and Karplus, 1991). Since these pioneering studies, cross-correlations and DCCMs have been used to analyze the fluctuations of many diverse systems, including proteins (Arcangeli et al, 1999;Parchment and Essex, 2000;Arcangeli et al, 2001;Rizzuti et al, 2001;Young et al, 2001;Luo and Bruice, 2002;Zoete et al, 2002), protein-nucleic acid complexes (Suenaga et al, 2000;Trylska et al, 2005), and enzymes (Bahar et al, 1997;Radkiewicz and Brooks III, 2000;Rod et al, 2003;Sulpizi et al, 2003;Agarwal, 2004;Gunasekaran and Nussinov, 2004;Schiøtt, 2004;Wong et al, 2004;Fuxreiter et al, 2005;Gorfe and Caflisch, 2005;Ma et al, 2005). A recent study analyzing both the B1 domain of protein G and ubiquitin suggests the correlated motions obtained from MD simulations agree well with measured NMR data (Lange et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%