2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16751-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics simulation on surface modification of quantum scaled CuO nano-clusters to support their experimental studies

Abstract: Interest in nanoparticle modification using functional chemicals has increased rapidly, as it allows more freedom of physiochemical tuning of the nanoparticle’s surface into biomedically oriented and designated properties. However, the observation and detection of the thin molecular layers on the nanoparticle surface are very challenging under current analytical facilities. The focus of this research is to demonstrate fundamental interactions between the surface treated nanoparticles and their host liquid medi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Sm-TiO 2 /SA complexes, some aggregation was observed, likely due to the formation of a chemical bond between the SA ligand and the Sm-TiO 2 surface. This explanation has also been proposed in carboxylic acid-modified CuO nanoparticles by Loya et al 22 Table 2 reports the Sm/Ti molar percentage of a set of selected samples, as determined by both EDX and XPS. It should be remarked that the latter technique is more representative of the surface composition of materials, whereas EDX should be able to evaluate also inner atomic layers, though in a semiquantitative way.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For the Sm-TiO 2 /SA complexes, some aggregation was observed, likely due to the formation of a chemical bond between the SA ligand and the Sm-TiO 2 surface. This explanation has also been proposed in carboxylic acid-modified CuO nanoparticles by Loya et al 22 Table 2 reports the Sm/Ti molar percentage of a set of selected samples, as determined by both EDX and XPS. It should be remarked that the latter technique is more representative of the surface composition of materials, whereas EDX should be able to evaluate also inner atomic layers, though in a semiquantitative way.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%