2011
DOI: 10.15669/pnst.2.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Dynamics Study on Grain Boundary Diffusion of Actinides and Oxygen in Oxide Fuels

Abstract: Diffusion phenomena of actinides and oxygen are relating to various properties of oxide fuels, e.g. actinide and oxygen redistribution, pore migration, sintering behavior. Although lots of experimental data have been obtained for U and O diffusions, these seem to be a little scattered among experiments. In addition, there are few studies of transuranium elements. Recently, we experimentally showed that diffusion coefficients of Am and Pu were almost comparable with that of U and the contribution of grain bound… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a microscopic scale, comparing to a reactive sintering, the intermediate milling step of the UMACS process allows the removal of several microstructural defects generated during solid solution formation. Indeed, the limitations of U 1Àx Am x O 2±d reactive sintering are presumably mainly due to the Kirkendall effect [20][21][22][23], since the rare data available on Am +III interdiffusion in U 0.8 Am 0.2 O 1.9 [24] or in UO 2 [25] and on self-diffusion of U in UO 2 and UO 2+d [26][27][28][29][30][31] suggest quite different diffusion kinetics within and between the two oxides. As a result, anchored closed porosity is created by the Kirkendall effect during the first thermal treatment and is eliminated by the grinding step.…”
Section: Discussion On Umacs Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a microscopic scale, comparing to a reactive sintering, the intermediate milling step of the UMACS process allows the removal of several microstructural defects generated during solid solution formation. Indeed, the limitations of U 1Àx Am x O 2±d reactive sintering are presumably mainly due to the Kirkendall effect [20][21][22][23], since the rare data available on Am +III interdiffusion in U 0.8 Am 0.2 O 1.9 [24] or in UO 2 [25] and on self-diffusion of U in UO 2 and UO 2+d [26][27][28][29][30][31] suggest quite different diffusion kinetics within and between the two oxides. As a result, anchored closed porosity is created by the Kirkendall effect during the first thermal treatment and is eliminated by the grinding step.…”
Section: Discussion On Umacs Processmentioning
confidence: 99%