1992
DOI: 10.1021/cr00016a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular electric moments from x-ray diffraction data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
129
1
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
17
129
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the cytosine base together with the C 1' substituent, the dipole moment from the full multipole model is 11 (2) Debye. For cytosine from cytosine monohydrate, the new full multipole refinement gives a dipole moment of 8.2 (15) Debye, in agreement with the previously reported value [8.0(14) Debye; Spackman, Weber & Craven, 1988] and with theoretical values (Spackman, 1992). The presently (e) 1-fl-D-Arabinosylcytosine.…”
Section: Molecular Dipole Momentssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For the cytosine base together with the C 1' substituent, the dipole moment from the full multipole model is 11 (2) Debye. For cytosine from cytosine monohydrate, the new full multipole refinement gives a dipole moment of 8.2 (15) Debye, in agreement with the previously reported value [8.0(14) Debye; Spackman, Weber & Craven, 1988] and with theoretical values (Spackman, 1992). The presently (e) 1-fl-D-Arabinosylcytosine.…”
Section: Molecular Dipole Momentssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The only contributions to the out-of-plane molecular moments are atomic second moments derived from the monopole and quadrupole functions; in contrast, the in-plane molecular moments depend upon these as well as net atomic charges (multiplied by the square of their distance from the centre-of-mass origin) and net atomic dipole moments (multiplied by their distance from the origin). In a sense the out-of-plane moments are less susceptible to variations in the parameters in the multipole model and this is entirely in accord with results of analyses of experimental data for urea, benzene and p-dicyanotetrafluorobenzene (Spackman, 1992), where agreement between experiment and theory was also observed to be much better for outof-plane than for in-plane moments.…”
Section: Second Momentssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Accumulated evidence suggests that high-quality X-ray diffraction data is capable of providing estimates of the electrostatic properties of molecules in crystals, in particular, electric moments (Spackman, 1992), energies of molecular interactions (Spackman, Weber & Craven, 1988) and electric field gradients (EFG's), especially at protons (Brown & Spackman, 1994). However, few charge density analyses involve determination of these properties, partly because of the present limitations of experimental data and partly because of some skepticism that the numbers derived are meaningful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimization that would produce unrealistic values of the electrostatic properties would obviously not be an acceptable procedure. (Spackman, 1992). "…”
Section: The Molecular Dipole Moment As a Test Of The Mem Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%