2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular engineered optical probes for chemical warfare agents and their mimics: Advances, challenges and perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 215 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluorescence detection is one of the most powerful methods for detecting ecologically and physiologically relevant analytes in the presence of interfering matrices. 58,59 It has attracted considerable attention because it combines the advantages of low-cost and robust detection due to its high sensitivity, great selectivity, fast response time, low detection limit, and ease of use. 60 Fluorescence biosensors can measure intensity, anisotropy, decay time, energy transfer efficiency, and quantum yield.…”
Section: Representative Types For Fluorescence Detection Of Opsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescence detection is one of the most powerful methods for detecting ecologically and physiologically relevant analytes in the presence of interfering matrices. 58,59 It has attracted considerable attention because it combines the advantages of low-cost and robust detection due to its high sensitivity, great selectivity, fast response time, low detection limit, and ease of use. 60 Fluorescence biosensors can measure intensity, anisotropy, decay time, energy transfer efficiency, and quantum yield.…”
Section: Representative Types For Fluorescence Detection Of Opsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, many fluorescent probes have been designed to detect mustard gas or its low-toxicity simulant (2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide, CEES) and phosgene. 10 Both SM and phosgene are bifunctional molecules, but SM and CEES are less electrophilic than phosgene. Therefore, the most commonly used nucleophilic atoms in fluorescent probes for SMs are sulfur atoms due to the large size and feature of easy polarization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of chemical reagent analysis and detection, small molecule fluorescent probes have been widely concerned for their advantages such as low cost, simple operation, high selectivity, and real-time imaging. For this reason, many fluorescent probes have been designed to detect mustard gas or its low-toxicity simulant (2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide, CEES) and phosgene . Both SM and phosgene are bifunctional molecules, but SM and CEES are less electrophilic than phosgene.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce the risk from the high volatility of sarin, diethylchlorophosphate (DCP) was usually used as a simulant in the laboratory because of its similar chemical activity and lower toxicity (Figure a) . In recent years, various fluorescent probes have been devoted to develop for detecting DCP, such as triphenylamine dyes, quinoline derivatives, , BODIPY dyes, rhodamine dyes, Schiff base, and polymers. The sensing mechanisms of these probes mainly include intramolecular charge transfer (ICT), , photo-induced electron transfer, excited-state intramolecular proton transfer, aggregation-induced emission (AIE), and cyclization. , However, there are still a few problems to be improved for the fluorescent probes, such as the low sensitivity and slow response. Especially, most probes can only show good sensing abilities in either solution or solid state, which limit their practical applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%