2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Xiangyang, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, hospital-associated SCCmec types were also found in this study, indicating a cross transmission between the community and hospital facilities. Moreover, the dominant STs (ST5, ST45, ST59 and ST188) in this study were consistent with other community-based populations [26,[35][36], but some other STs were also previously reported in hospital patients (ST338 and ST1) [37][38][39] and animals ( ST398 and ST1) [40][41][42]. The MLST findings also indicated the cross transmission between communities and hospital settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, hospital-associated SCCmec types were also found in this study, indicating a cross transmission between the community and hospital facilities. Moreover, the dominant STs (ST5, ST45, ST59 and ST188) in this study were consistent with other community-based populations [26,[35][36], but some other STs were also previously reported in hospital patients (ST338 and ST1) [37][38][39] and animals ( ST398 and ST1) [40][41][42]. The MLST findings also indicated the cross transmission between communities and hospital settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The aforementioned erava MIC data differ from the reported data previously showing higher erava MICs in MRSA than MSSA [3, 4]. These differences could be due, at least in part, to sample and regional variation given that the molecular and antimicrobial susceptibility characteristics of S. aureus are known to vary across regionsand the very limited volume of data that have been reported regarding erava effects on S. aureus [28, 29]. Previously, there has been a focus on the antimicrobial susceptibility of erava mainly in the multi-drug resistant S. aureus , including MRSA as well as vancomycin-resistant and linezolid-resistant isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Erava, being a new Tet class drug, has not yet completed its phase III clinical trial and does not yet have its own susceptibility breakpoints recommended by CLSI [37, 24]. Consequently, we referred conservatively to the tigecycline susceptibility MIC breakpoint for S. aureus of 0.5 mg/L, which was derived from the US Food and Drug Administration [24–26, 28]. The available data thus far suggest that erava is two- to four-fold more active than tigecycline against common clinically important Gram-positive aerobic species [3, 4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, more than 50% of the isolates from both hospitals were identified as MRSA, and this rate was similar to the detection rate in other cities in China. 15,16 All of the strains exhibited high resistance against penicillin, erythromycin, and clindamycin. However, no strains were resistant to vancomycin, linezolid, or nitrofurantoin, indicating that these drugs were still effective in treating orthopedic infections caused by S. aureus isolates and could be the first-choice drugs for treating severe MRSA infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%