2011
DOI: 10.1086/659408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Colonization by Vancomycin-ResistantEnterococcusin Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

Abstract: Molecular studies showed that in the majority of VRE-colonized patients the strains were unique, arguing that VRE acquisition was sporadic rather than resulting from a common source of transmission. Patient-specific factors, including prior antibiotic exposure, rather than breaches in infection control likely predict for risk of fecal VRE colonization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several studies have focused on risk factors for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infection or colonization [23,24], little is known about risk factors for BSI due to vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies have focused on risk factors for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infection or colonization [23,24], little is known about risk factors for BSI due to vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular epidemiology analysis revealed a primarily sporadic pattern of VRE acquisition in which the majority of the patients harbored unique VRE strains. 4 Based on the inefficiency of the contact isolation and the molecular epidemiology data, a decision was made to discontinue the systematic surveillance for VRE and contact …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively small number of articles described VRE colonization in hematological patients 10,[16][17][18][19] . Immunosuppressed patients appear to be at special risk for VRE colonization and severe VRE infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%