2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2018.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular epidemiology of Babesia vogeli in dogs from the southeastern region of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors observed that newly weaned young dogs were more susceptible to disease due to the stress of adapting to food and the environment. Our results also corroborate those of Paulino et al (2018), who found that animals under five years of age were more likely to test positive for B. vogeli DNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These authors observed that newly weaned young dogs were more susceptible to disease due to the stress of adapting to food and the environment. Our results also corroborate those of Paulino et al (2018), who found that animals under five years of age were more likely to test positive for B. vogeli DNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This may be due to the shorter time of circulation of B. vogeli in the blood of infected animals. Epidemiological data from previous studies demonstrated that B. vogeli is highly prevalent in Brazil, with up to 8.2% molecularly positive dogs in Pernambuco (Ramos et al 2010 ; Dantas-Torres et al 2021 ), 8.0% in São Paulo (O’Dwyer et al 2009 ), 10.0% in Paraíba (Rotondano et al 2015 ), 15.0% in Ceará (Fonsêca et al 2022 ), 30.6% in Minas Gerais (Barbosa et al 2020 ) and 14.1% in Rio de Janeiro (Paulino et al 2018 ; Camilo et al 2021 ). Conversely, H. canis has been reported with lower prevalence (i.e., 0.4% to 5.4%) in Northeastern Brazil (Ramos et al 2010 ; Dantas-Torres et al 2021 ), differently from the Southeastern region, in which higher prevalence values (i.e., 58.7–79.2%) were reported (Miranda et al 2014 ; Spolidorio et al 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding factors associated with infection (Table 1); although, male and defined-breed dogs exhibited higher positivity, variables, such as sex and breed, revealed no statistical association with Babesia spp. infection as COSTA-JÚNIOR et al (2009), SILVA et al (2012), ARAÚJO et al (2015), and PAULINO et al (2018 reported in their studies.…”
Section: ) ---------------------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although, no statistical difference was observed in relation to age and infection with Babesia spp., the frequency of positive dogs was higher in the group of animals<1 year of age (5.3%). Accounting for factors such as immature immune system associated with the stress of adapting to a new environment and a new diet, young and weaned dogs are actually more susceptible to disease (PAULINO et al, 2018). However, some reports in the literature described a higher prevalence in adult dogs (GUIMARÃES et al 2009;ARAÚJO et al, 2015;SILVA et al 2016), attributing senility to greater infestation and time to vector exposure, thus increasing the possibility of acquiring the infection.…”
Section: ) ---------------------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%