2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular evaluation of gene mutation profiles and copy number variations in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the AML group, we observed notable preservation of correlations among markers predominantly expressed by lymphoid cells and disruption between myeloid markers. This suggests a potential compartmentalization within the leukemic process of AML, where the malignant blasts primarily affect the myeloid lineage while leaving the lymphoid lineage relatively intact (Jaddaoui et al, 2022; Khoury et al, 2022; Meena et al, 2022). The B-ALL group displayed a different pattern, with maintained correlations between T lymphocyte markers but disruptions observed for B lymphocyte and myeloid markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the AML group, we observed notable preservation of correlations among markers predominantly expressed by lymphoid cells and disruption between myeloid markers. This suggests a potential compartmentalization within the leukemic process of AML, where the malignant blasts primarily affect the myeloid lineage while leaving the lymphoid lineage relatively intact (Jaddaoui et al, 2022; Khoury et al, 2022; Meena et al, 2022). The B-ALL group displayed a different pattern, with maintained correlations between T lymphocyte markers but disruptions observed for B lymphocyte and myeloid markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was decreased compared to the proportion of AML, NOS (44.5%, 216/485). With the advances in gene detection technologies, patients are divided into more precise categories with clearer treatment strategies and prognoses ( 9 11 ). For instance, the mutations of ASXL1, BCOR, EZH2, SF3B1, SRSF2, STAG2, U2AF1 , and ZRSR2 genes are added as the defining cytogenetic abnormalities, and patients carrying one of which are considered a member of the AML-MR subgroup, while the subgroup defined by RUNX1 mutation is abolished.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%