“…This analysis simultaneously reconstructs gene trees, ancestral population sizes, and the geographical ranges of inferred nodes, which can be visualized through time provided appropriate calibrations or substitution rates are supplied. As no reliable estimates of substitution rates or calibrations based on fossils or geological events are available for Pelobates, we estimated a substitution rate for the mtDNA fragment used (ND4+ adjacent tRNAs) in a family‐level phylogenetic analysis including representatives of the families Scaphiopodidade ( Scaphiopus couchii Baird, 1854, accession: , and Spea bombifrons (Cope, 1863): , Zhang et al ., ), Pelodytidae ( Pelodytes caucasicus Boulenger, 1896: , P. ibericus Sánchez Herráiz, Barbadillo‐Escrivá, Machordom & Sanchiz, 2000: , and P. punctatus (Daudin, 1802): , Díaz‐Rodríguez et al ., ), Megophryidae ( Leptobrachium montanum Fischer, 1885: , Scutiger cf mammatus (Günther, 1896): , and Oreolalax jingdongensis Ma, Yang & Li, 1983: , Rao & Wilkinson, ), and Pelobatidae (including one sequence of P. cultripes – voucher PC935‐ , and another one of its sister taxon P. varaldii Pasteur & Bons, 1959 – voucher IMS1148‐). Based on the estimates of Roelants et al .…”