The Wiley‐Blackwell Handbook of Individual Differences 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781444343120.ch11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Genetic Aspects of Personality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 89 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is a logical next step trying to identify specific genes that account for this genetic variance. However, despite marked advances in molecular biology and genetics during the past decade that have included techniques that make it possible to search the entire genome for genetic variants, which may be related to disease states or psychological traits (see also Strobel and Brocke, 2011), our knowledge of specific genes that are responsible for, and provide a sufficient explanation of, specific behavioral outcomes is rather limited (e.g., Johnson et al, 2011) and it seems unlikely "that most of the genes responsible for the heritability for any complex trait will be identified in the foreseeable future" (Haworth and Plomin, 2010: p. 784). The present article will therefore focus on the quantitativegenetic approach and primarily on twin studies constituting the bulk of the pertinent evidence, although we acknowledge adoption designs as alternative or complementary approaches, which are discussed in detail elsewhere (Plomin et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is a logical next step trying to identify specific genes that account for this genetic variance. However, despite marked advances in molecular biology and genetics during the past decade that have included techniques that make it possible to search the entire genome for genetic variants, which may be related to disease states or psychological traits (see also Strobel and Brocke, 2011), our knowledge of specific genes that are responsible for, and provide a sufficient explanation of, specific behavioral outcomes is rather limited (e.g., Johnson et al, 2011) and it seems unlikely "that most of the genes responsible for the heritability for any complex trait will be identified in the foreseeable future" (Haworth and Plomin, 2010: p. 784). The present article will therefore focus on the quantitativegenetic approach and primarily on twin studies constituting the bulk of the pertinent evidence, although we acknowledge adoption designs as alternative or complementary approaches, which are discussed in detail elsewhere (Plomin et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%