Inflorescence structures result from the activities of meristems, which coordinate both the renewal of stem cells in the center and organ formation at the periphery. The fate of a meristem is specified at its initiation and changes as the plant develops. During rice inflorescence development, newly formed meristems acquire a branch meristem (BM) identity, and can generate further meristems or terminate as spikelets. Thus, the form of rice inflorescence is determined by a reiterative pattern of decisions made at the meristems. In the dominant gain-of-function mutant tawawa1-D, the activity of the inflorescence meristem (IM) is extended and spikelet specification is delayed, resulting in prolonged branch formation and increased numbers of spikelets. In contrast, reductions in TAWAWA1 (TAW1) activity cause precocious IM abortion and spikelet formation, resulting in the generation of small inflorescences. TAW1 encodes a nuclear protein of unknown function and shows high levels of expression in the shoot apical meristem, the IM, and the BMs. TAW1 expression disappears from incipient spikelet meristems (SMs). We also demonstrate that members of the SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE subfamily of MADS-box genes function downstream of TAW1. We thus propose that TAW1 is a unique regulator of meristem activity in rice and regulates inflorescence development through the promotion of IM activity and suppression of the phase change to SM identity.ALOG family | meristem identity | grain yield T he timing of each meristem phase change is crucial in the control of inflorescence architecture (1-3). In grass species, the basic architecture of inflorescence is defined by the spatial arrangement of spikelets, which are small branches containing a variable number of flowers. Among the meristems that are generated from the primary inflorescence meristem (IM) during inflorescence (panicle) development, early ones acquire an indeterminate branch meristem (BM) identity, whereas later ones are specified as determinate spikelet meristems (SMs) (Fig. 1A) (4, 5). The BMs themselves are eventually transformed into SMs after generating a certain number of branches and spikelets (Fig. 1B). Thus, the pattern of SM specification is a primary determinant of grass inflorescence form. Delays in SM specification lead to iterations of branching, resulting in larger panicles that could potentially produce more grain. Conversely, the acceleration of SM specification results in smaller panicles with fewer spikelets. Rice inflorescence development exhibits an additional unique feature in that the IM loses its activity after producing several BMs, leaving a vestige at the tip of the rachis, the inflorescence main stem (Fig. 1A). Therefore, the timing of IM abortion is also a critical factor determining the form of rice inflorescence.The competence of a meristem to become an SM gradually increases during inflorescence development; however, the molecular basis for the timing of SM specification is largely unknown.To date, several genes that control inflorescence form ...