2016
DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2016.1227373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Genetics Informs Spatial Segregation of Two Desert Stream Gila Species

Abstract: Headwater Chub Gila nigra and Roundtail Chub G. robusta are two distinct but morphologically similar cyprinid species that historically were parapatric in Fossil Creek (Gila River basin) in central Arizona. The creek was chemically treated in 2005 to eradicate nonnative fishes, and chubs salvaged before the treatment were repatriated afterward.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…robusta, so while it is possible clade 5 represents a geographically restricted lineage, additional geographical sampling will similarly likely erode the unity of this clade. In any case, whatever the finding with clade 5, our data are consistent with previous studies based on allozyme, mtDNA, and microsatellite markers that likewise failed to find diagnostic characters among these nominal species (DeMarais, 1992;DeMarais et al, 1992;Dowling & DeMarais, 1993;Dowling et al, 2015, Marsh, Clarkson & Dowling, 2017. The average most recent common ancestor of each of the clades resolved in this study is 63kya (51kya to 76 kya 95 HPD interval) with the most recent common ancestor of all populations 119 kya (97 kya to 140 kya 95% HPD interval).…”
Section: Phylogenomics and Hybridizationsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…robusta, so while it is possible clade 5 represents a geographically restricted lineage, additional geographical sampling will similarly likely erode the unity of this clade. In any case, whatever the finding with clade 5, our data are consistent with previous studies based on allozyme, mtDNA, and microsatellite markers that likewise failed to find diagnostic characters among these nominal species (DeMarais, 1992;DeMarais et al, 1992;Dowling & DeMarais, 1993;Dowling et al, 2015, Marsh, Clarkson & Dowling, 2017. The average most recent common ancestor of each of the clades resolved in this study is 63kya (51kya to 76 kya 95 HPD interval) with the most recent common ancestor of all populations 119 kya (97 kya to 140 kya 95% HPD interval).…”
Section: Phylogenomics and Hybridizationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…hybridization producing viable offspring is a common occurrence (Gerber, Tibbets & Dowling, 2001;Marsh, Clarkson & Dowling, 2017). This history, coupled with the cyclical nature of Manuscript to be reviewed glacially driven pluvial periods makes it unlikely that evolutionary forces will induce speciation in the absence of permanent barriers to gene flow.…”
Section: Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These periods of isolation may have promoted an accumulation of ecological divergences that persisted post-contact, and were sufficient to maintain species boundaries despite contemporary sympatric distributions and weak morphological differentiation. This hypothesis is also supported by the non-random mating found among G. robusta and G. nigra, despite anthropogenically-induced contact (Marsh et al 2017).…”
Section: Complex Evolution and Biogeography Of The Colorado Rivermentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Marsh et al . () consider the Gila robusta complex as three cryptic species and used microsatellites to distinguish between G . robusta and G .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the conceptual framework of for monophyly of any of the species within the G. robusta species complex using one mitochondrial and several nuclear genes. Marsh et al (2017) consider the Gila robusta complex as three cryptic species and used microsatellites to distinguish between G. robusta and G. nigra, document hybridization and identify the replacement of G. nigra with G. robusta in middle sections of a single stream. The American Fisheries Society and the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists Joint Committee on the Names of Fishes, however, recently investigated the taxonomic status of species in the robusta complex and, based on preliminary whole-genome sequence data (Copus et al, 2016), determined the available genetic and morphological data supports a single species rather than three (Page et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%