2000
DOI: 10.1021/jp0014770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Geometries at Sixth Order Møller−Plesset Perturbation Theory. At What Order Does MP Theory Give Exact Geometries?

Abstract: Sixth order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP6) in connection with correlation consistent basis sets cc-pVDZ, cc-pVTZ, and cc-pVQZ was used to calculate accurate equilibrium geometries for 14 molecules and to establish the complete basis set (CBS) limit for MP6 with an extrapolation method that is based on CBS limit geometries obtained at second order MP (MP2) and at fourth order MP (MP4) perturbation theory. MP6 equilibrium geometries are more accurate than MP2 or MP4 geometries provided a sufficiently l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test if this overestimation leads to errors in conformational energies, low energy conformers of ethane, propane, isobutane, methanol, ethanol, 1‐propanol, 2‐propanol, EME, methoxymethanol, HOP, methyl formate, methyl acetate, and ethyl formate were reoptimized at the MP2/aug‐cc‐pVTZ level. It has been shown previously that this level of theory predicts bond lengths with an accuracy of 0.006 Å 45, 46. The optimization with the triple‐zeta basis set did not change conformational energies significantly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…To test if this overestimation leads to errors in conformational energies, low energy conformers of ethane, propane, isobutane, methanol, ethanol, 1‐propanol, 2‐propanol, EME, methoxymethanol, HOP, methyl formate, methyl acetate, and ethyl formate were reoptimized at the MP2/aug‐cc‐pVTZ level. It has been shown previously that this level of theory predicts bond lengths with an accuracy of 0.006 Å 45, 46. The optimization with the triple‐zeta basis set did not change conformational energies significantly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…A large amount of attention has been spent on the prediction of properties in the limit of a CBS based on extrapolation procedures 21–26, 54, 58–80, including studies with particular emphasis on the prediction of equilibrium geometries 26, 62, 69, 76, 77, 80. Specifically, comparisons have been made between CBS extrapolations of geometrical parameters, that is, bond lengths, as observed from PESs calculated with and without counterpoise correction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each basis set, the equilibrium geometry of the complex was determined so that via extrapolation of calculated geometry parameters a reliable CCSD(T)/CBS (complete basis set) limit geometry could be obtained. [44][45][46] In the same way, CCSD(T)/CBS values for D e and the 12 vibrational frequencies of the WD were determined. For both energy and geometry, we used a 3-point and a 2-point extrapolation procedure always including the CCSD(T)/ aug-cc-pV5Z results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%