2000
DOI: 10.1006/mgme.2000.3015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Heterosis: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
245
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
16
245
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The model for the effect of R219K on APOB and CSF Ab 1-42 suggested by the above data implies either heterosis (Comings and MacMurray 2000) or a possible interaction with other variants in ABCA1 (or a nearby gene). To begin exploring this latter possibility in the CVD sample (since it affords the most power to detect such effects), genotyping of the I883M and R1587K variants was performed, and ANOVA used to model the potential independent main effects in a joint analysis of all three markers (including R219K).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The model for the effect of R219K on APOB and CSF Ab 1-42 suggested by the above data implies either heterosis (Comings and MacMurray 2000) or a possible interaction with other variants in ABCA1 (or a nearby gene). To begin exploring this latter possibility in the CVD sample (since it affords the most power to detect such effects), genotyping of the I883M and R1587K variants was performed, and ANOVA used to model the potential independent main effects in a joint analysis of all three markers (including R219K).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Alternatively, it is possible that this is an example of molecular heterosis, a common phenomenon that may be seen in as many as 50% of association studies. 51 A more complete assessment of this and the genetic associations that were observed among other cohorts await further investigation in the patient cohorts of other investigators, to establish whether there is wider support for FAT as a putative susceptibility gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The results of the additional analyses on three subsamples indicate that the chance of a false negative finding is minimal. Finally, it was considered that the significant v 2 test for DSM-IV major depression could indicate that there is no additive or dominance effect, but that a mechanism called negative heterosis plays a role (Comings and MacMurray 2000). Since the TDT models an additive effect, the absence of a significant result does not exclude the possibility of heterosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%