2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-012-0242-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular identification of two species of the carnivorous sea slug Philine, invaders of the US west coast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The determination of the identity of non‐indigenous invasive species is fundamental to assess their origin, and hence to understand the characteristics that have facilitated their colonization and establishment success, as well as to allow their potential control or eradication (Stepien & Tumeo, ; Dubey & Shine, ; Krug et al ., ). However, the correct identification of alien species is not always evident, particularly when it is based on morphological characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The determination of the identity of non‐indigenous invasive species is fundamental to assess their origin, and hence to understand the characteristics that have facilitated their colonization and establishment success, as well as to allow their potential control or eradication (Stepien & Tumeo, ; Dubey & Shine, ; Krug et al ., ). However, the correct identification of alien species is not always evident, particularly when it is based on morphological characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“… Philine argentata was maintained as a distinct species by Chaban (2014) owing to differences in gizzard plate morphology, and subsequently by Chaban et al (2019) . The Chaban et al (2019) sequence of P. scalpta A. Adams, 1862 ( MN326894 ) was unexpectedly included with robust bootstrap support in a clade of sequences supposed to be from P. orientalis that were collected by Krug et al (2012) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We determined sequences of 16S ribosomal RNA ( 16S rRNA ), histone H3 ( H3 ), and the D1 expansion region of 28S ribosomal RNA (D1 28S rRNA ). We then performed phylogenetic analyses of the sequences, including sequences from previous DNA studies of the Philinidae ( Krug et al 2012 ; Ohnheiser and Malaquias 2013 ; Gonzales and Gosliner 2014 ; Oskars et al 2015 ; Chaban et al 2019 ). We were unable to sequence the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I bar-coding region, a difficulty also found by Krug et al (2012) , possibly explaining why there are relatively few GenBank accessions for this gene from Philine .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the H3 results, all specimens of D. parguerensis from two geographically distant locations (Puerto Rico and Panama) have unique substitutions in the 16S gene (genetic synapomorphies) that suggest reproductive isolation from D. occidentalis . The 16S gene is variable enough to distinguish among species of opisthobranchs of diverse clades (Turner & Wilson, 2007; Anthes et al , 2008; Johnson & Gosliner, 2012, Krug et al , 2012a) and is even informative in population genetics studies (Krug et al , 2012b). Moreover, the F ST analysis of 16S confirmed that the two species ( D. parguerensis and D. occidentalis ) are genetically distinct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%