2015
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-621110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular insights into regulation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Abstract: The critical role of Janus kinase-2 (JAK2) in regulation of myelopoiesis was established 2 decades ago, but identification of mutations in the pseudokinase domain of JAK2 in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and in other hematologic malignancies highlighted the role of JAK2 in human disease. These findings have revolutionized the diagnostics of MPNs and led to development of novel JAK2 therapeutics. However, the molecular mechanisms by which mutations in the pseudokinase domain lead to hyperactivation of JAK… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), mutations in both the pseudokinase domain (R683G/S) and the kinase domain (D873R, P933R) have been linked to the disease. Recent structural data on JAKs show how the pseudokinase domain interacts with the kinase domain to maintain low basal activity (Lupardus et al, 2014, Shan et al, 2014, and most of the pathogenic mutations localize in this interface and are expected to destabilize the inhibitory interaction and lead to constitutive kinase activation (Silvennoinen and Hubbard, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), mutations in both the pseudokinase domain (R683G/S) and the kinase domain (D873R, P933R) have been linked to the disease. Recent structural data on JAKs show how the pseudokinase domain interacts with the kinase domain to maintain low basal activity (Lupardus et al, 2014, Shan et al, 2014, and most of the pathogenic mutations localize in this interface and are expected to destabilize the inhibitory interaction and lead to constitutive kinase activation (Silvennoinen and Hubbard, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism by which this occurs is increasingly becoming clear. 6 In short, there is evidence that the mutation may reduce the autoinhibitory function of the JH2 domain via changes in JH1-JH2 conformation 7 and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding. 8 The expression of JAK2V617F has been shown to allow for JAK2 signaling in the absence of cytokine receptor ligation, 3,4 but the expression of type I cytokine receptors 9 and a functional FERM domain (required for receptor binding) 10 are still required for JAK2 signaling and cytokine-independent growth.…”
Section: Molecular Consequences Of Jak2 Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogous to the V617F mutation in JAK2, which is implicated in the etiology of several myeloproliferative neoplasms, this mutation within the JAK1 JH2 pseudokinase domain is thought to relieve an auto-inhibitory interaction with the catalytic JH1 domain, thereby increasing Tyr kinase activity independently of cytokine stimulation (1) (50). In contrast to wildtype JAK1, transient expression of V658F-mutant JAK1 in JAK1-null U4C cells was sufficient to trigger detectable Tyr phosphorylation of both STAT1 and STAT3 in the absence of added cytokine (Fig.…”
Section: Ampk-mediated Inhibition Of Jak1-dependent Signaling Requirementioning
confidence: 99%