2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2011.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular interpretation of Trouton’s and Hildebrand’s rules for the entropy of vaporization of a liquid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use by QHA of a single broad harmonic potential makes it sensitive to conformational changes, slower in convergence, and prone to predicting a much larger entropy increase. The excessive nature of the QHA spread is highlighted by being larger than the entropy change for the vaporization of a liquid to a gas of ∼85 J K −1 mol −1 by Trouton's rule, 81 and yet conformational change in solution involves a much smaller gain in flexibility. Two reasons for the better performance of MCC are the use of rotational coordinates and the closely Gaussian distribution of forces to which is fitted a single harmonic potential averaged over all energy wells with a separate term to account for the multimodal dihedral distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use by QHA of a single broad harmonic potential makes it sensitive to conformational changes, slower in convergence, and prone to predicting a much larger entropy increase. The excessive nature of the QHA spread is highlighted by being larger than the entropy change for the vaporization of a liquid to a gas of ∼85 J K −1 mol −1 by Trouton's rule, 81 and yet conformational change in solution involves a much smaller gain in flexibility. Two reasons for the better performance of MCC are the use of rotational coordinates and the closely Gaussian distribution of forces to which is fitted a single harmonic potential averaged over all energy wells with a separate term to account for the multimodal dihedral distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another viable method for liquid-phase entropy is the cell approximation which maps regions of the potential energy surface into single, representative energy wells, whose entropy is determined from the force [ 34 ] plus an entropy term for the probability distribution of the energy wells [ 35 ]. This is the method we have been working to generalise, progressing from liquid argon [ 34 ] to liquid water with its rotational vibration and orientational degrees of freedom [ 35 , 36 , 37 ], organic liquids with an internal one-dimensional dihedral entropy [ 38 ], single molecules with internal entropy based on force correlation [ 39 ], and molecular liquids in a multiscale framework from atom to united atom to molecule to system [ 40 ]. This development has been supported by extensive parallel studies on the entropy of aqueous solutions [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The philosophy of our approach is that it should be simple, fast, scalable, general, treats all molecules equivalently, gives a decomposition of entropy over all degrees of freedom of the system to explain the entropy obtained, and achieves comparable accuracy to that of the force-field used. The method builds on our earlier work for liquid water, 27,37 organic liquids 71 and single flexible molecules of united atoms. 29 Previously for water, vibrational frequencies had been extracted from force and torque magnitudes 27 or squared forces and squared torques 37 and the number of energy wells had been calculated using a generalized Pauling model [52][53][54][55]72 originally developed for the residual entropy of ice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vibrational Entropy The size of each energy well is determined from the forces and torques on the particle and thermal de Broglie wavelengths and waveangles from the integrals over translational and rotational momenta. 53,71,75 Correlations between the forces and torques of different particles are accounted for in a covariance matrix. One immediate assumption made is that the vibrational entropy of the atoms within each united atom is small and can be ignored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%