2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep24051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Inversion Probes for targeted resequencing in non-model organisms

Abstract: Applications that require resequencing of hundreds or thousands of predefined genomic regions in numerous samples are common in studies of non-model organisms. However few approaches at the scale intermediate between multiplex PCR and sequence capture methods are available. Here we explored the utility of Molecular Inversion Probes (MIPs) for the medium-scale targeted resequencing in a non-model system. Markers targeting 112 bp of exonic sequence were designed from transcriptome of Lissotriton newts. We assess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
47
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fragments of 1,233 nuclear genes and one mitochondrial protein coding gene were resequenced with Molecular Inversion Probes (MIPs), following the protocol of Niedzicka, Fijarczyk, Dudek, Stuglik, and Babik (). A total of 1,485 MIPs, each targeting 112 bp of genomic sequence, were used (for details see Appendix ), in most cases a single MIP per gene.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fragments of 1,233 nuclear genes and one mitochondrial protein coding gene were resequenced with Molecular Inversion Probes (MIPs), following the protocol of Niedzicka, Fijarczyk, Dudek, Stuglik, and Babik (). A total of 1,485 MIPs, each targeting 112 bp of genomic sequence, were used (for details see Appendix ), in most cases a single MIP per gene.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each marker was located in a single exon to allow amplification from genomic DNA. The bioinformatics pipeline used to design markers, laboratory procedures, and sequencing are described in detail in Niedzicka et al (2016). The MIP markers used to construct the linkage map fell into two groups (Supplemental Material, Table S1 in File S1):

Markers informative in the F2 cross, i.e.

…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, generation P individuals were alternative homozygotes in an overwhelming majority of such SNPs. A subset of 205 group 1 markers were reported in Niedzicka et al (2016).Markers designed in genes involved in immune response reported by Fijarczyk et al (2016) and other randomly picked transcripts. Several MIPs were designed for most genes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One Lm and one Lvg population sample (19 individuals each) were analyzed. Resequencing was performed with Molecular Inversion Probes (MIP, Niedzicka et al 2016, supplementary table S3, Supplementary Material online). MIPs were designed from transcripts with exon boundaries identified through BLAST searches against X. tropicalis gene models (Niedzicka et al 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resequencing was performed with Molecular Inversion Probes (MIP, Niedzicka et al 2016, supplementary table S3, Supplementary Material online). MIPs were designed from transcripts with exon boundaries identified through BLAST searches against X. tropicalis gene models (Niedzicka et al 2016). Because many vertebrate exons are short, to maximize the length of the target available for MIP design in candidate BS genes, sequence capture reads were assembled into contigs using Trinity (release v2.0.4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%